1992
DOI: 10.1109/9.148348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control-relevant prefiltering: a systematic design approach and case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, there is considerable interest in process identification (or system identification), namely, developing empirical dynamic models from input-output data. Typically, process identification is the most demanding and time consuming step in the industrial implementation of advanced control strategies [196].…”
Section: Multivariable Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is considerable interest in process identification (or system identification), namely, developing empirical dynamic models from input-output data. Typically, process identification is the most demanding and time consuming step in the industrial implementation of advanced control strategies [196].…”
Section: Multivariable Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above idea is the basis in Rivera, Pollard, and Garcia (1992) where, for numerical reasons, an iterative procedure is proposed where the estimated model from iteration k − 1 is used in the noise model at iteration k.…”
Section: Prefiltering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general idea is to find the best nominal model for controller design, instead of the model that can minimize the open loop prediction error of the experiment data. Although control-relevant nominal models can be found through a variety of "identification for control" approaches [1], [2], [3], there is no guarantee that the controller designed from the identified model will have a satisfactory performance with a set of models within an estimated model uncertainty region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%