2006
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2006.882938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control Reconfiguration After Actuator Failures Using Disturbance Decoupling Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
88
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main idea of the virtual actuator FTC method, first introduced in Lunze and Steffen (2006), is to reconfigure the faulty plant such that the nominal controller could still be used without need of retuning it. The plant with the faulty actuators is modified adding the virtual actuator block that masks the fault and allows the controller to see the same plant as before the fault.…”
Section: Virtual Actuator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main idea of the virtual actuator FTC method, first introduced in Lunze and Steffen (2006), is to reconfigure the faulty plant such that the nominal controller could still be used without need of retuning it. The plant with the faulty actuators is modified adding the virtual actuator block that masks the fault and allows the controller to see the same plant as before the fault.…”
Section: Virtual Actuator Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the reconfiguration block aims at tolerating actuator faults, it is named virtual actuator. Initially proposed in a state space form for LTI systems (Lunze and Steffen, 2006), this paradigm has been successfully extended to other system structures (Rotondo Dziekan et al, 2011;Richter et al, 2011;Blesa et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed strategy relied on virtual actuators, a fault-hiding technique that aims at reconfiguring the faulty plant instead of the controller [17]- [21]. In [22], this strategy has been extended to linear parameter varying (LPV) systems, a standard formalism for performing gain scheduling of nonlinear systems [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lunze and Steffen (2006) showed that control reconfiguration of a linear system after an actuator fault is equivalent to disturbance decoupling. Control reconfiguration methods using virtual actuators and sensors for piecewise affine systems and Hammerstein-Wiener systems were proposed in , , Richter et al (2011) and Richter (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%