1993
DOI: 10.2514/3.20993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of wing-rock motion of slender delta wings

Abstract: A theoretical analysis is conducted to determine the optimal control input for wing-rock suppression through a Hamiltonian formulation. The optimality equations are analyzed through Beecham-Titchener's averaging technique and numerically integrated by a backward-differentiation formulas method developed for implicit differential equations. The weighting factors in the cost function are shown to be related explicitly to the system output damping and frequency. A numerical model constructed for an 80-deg delta w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…oscillatory rolling motion in the presence of some initial disturbance in slender delta wings that needs to be prevented. The problem has gained considerable attention owing to its practical importance and to this end, various approaches have been presented in the literature for the control of the wing-rock motion (Luo and Lan 1993;Singh, Yim, and Wells 1995;Monahemi and Krstic 1996;Araujo and Singh 1998). In general, the controllers designed on the International Journal of Control 975 assumption of knowledge of the aerodynamic parameters will not offer satisfactory performance in the presence of uncertainty and modelling inaccuracies.…”
Section: Illustrative Example: Control Of Wing-rock Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…oscillatory rolling motion in the presence of some initial disturbance in slender delta wings that needs to be prevented. The problem has gained considerable attention owing to its practical importance and to this end, various approaches have been presented in the literature for the control of the wing-rock motion (Luo and Lan 1993;Singh, Yim, and Wells 1995;Monahemi and Krstic 1996;Araujo and Singh 1998). In general, the controllers designed on the International Journal of Control 975 assumption of knowledge of the aerodynamic parameters will not offer satisfactory performance in the presence of uncertainty and modelling inaccuracies.…”
Section: Illustrative Example: Control Of Wing-rock Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) contains a numerical approximation to the disturbance. This information can be used to correct the control input into the system using the relation 8 (13) whereū represents the nominal control input andẑ + represents the updated states of the disturbance process. There is a time delay present in this formulation because the measurement vector, Y k , must be given before the disturbance in the system can be updated using Eq.…”
Section: Disturbance Accommodating Controller For Nonlinear Systementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though fuzzy control has been successfully applied in many applications but due to the lack of formal synthesis techniques that can guarantee the system stability, it has not been viewed as a rigorous technique. An optimal feedback control based design for wing rock is presented in [17]. The results show that an effective way to suppress wing rock is to control the roll rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%