2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0017-8_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of transonic periodic flow on NACA0012 aerofoil by contour bumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 (a) and 2(b) show the model of a circular arc blade with bump on the blade for without angle of attack (θ = 0°) and with angle of attack (θ = 3.2°, 8.5°) to the free stream flow, respectively. The bump has length and height of 10% and 2% of blade chord length, respectively [4]. The crest of the bump is located at the position Table 1.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 (a) and 2(b) show the model of a circular arc blade with bump on the blade for without angle of attack (θ = 0°) and with angle of attack (θ = 3.2°, 8.5°) to the free stream flow, respectively. The bump has length and height of 10% and 2% of blade chord length, respectively [4]. The crest of the bump is located at the position Table 1.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, bump wall on the blade is considered as an effective control technique [4][5]. In high speed aerodynamics, expansion of vapor/carrier gas mixture (moist air) or steam is often so rapid (cooling rate ≈ 1k/μs) that the non-equilibrium condensation will occur after a supersaturated state is attained [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current CFD techniques for prediction of periodic transonic flows (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)22,24,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) are primarily based on two methods. The first method consists of solving the time accurate Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations (24,26,29,38,40) directly using an implicit or explicit numeric scheme in conjunction with algebraic or non-linear turbulence models (or, more recently, using Large Eddy Simulation, LES). The second method is the interactive boundary-layer coupling method (15,22) and involves the solution of an outer inviscid region and an inner viscous boundary-layer which is coupled through the boundary condition on the wing and wake.…”
Section: Prediction Of Periodic Transonic Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the NACA0012 aerofoil with a RANS approach, all three kinds of periodic motion were identified on the upper surface of the aerofoil ranging between Mach 0⋅7 and 0⋅8, at different angles of incidence and Reynolds numbers based on chord ranging from 1 to 14 × 10 6 (38) . For example, at M = 0⋅775, Re = 10 × 10 6 and four degrees incidence with a Baldwin-Lomax turbulence model, a type B periodic motion was observed.…”
Section: Naca 0012 Aerofoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following NS-type, laminar, unsteady hyperbolic matrix equation system is written for both the gas fraction and the condensed part of the fluid mixture, and stands for example as the background of the Eagle solver (Tulita et al, 2002), used in many previous aerodynamic investigations at QUB and UPB. A single type of condensed particles is considered, in other words the chemical interactions are seen as minimal and not interfering with the flow process.…”
Section: Equations Governing the Exo-atmospheric Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%