2009
DOI: 10.1029/2009ja014066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of the energetic proton flux in the inner radiation belt by artificial means

Abstract: [1] Earth's inner radiation belt located inside L = 2 is dominated by a relatively stable flux of trapped protons with energy from a few to over 100 MeV. Radiation effects in spacecraft electronics caused by the inner radiation belt protons are the major cause of performance anomalies and lifetime of Low Earth Orbit satellites. For electronic components with large feature size, of the order of a micron, anomalies occur mainly when crossing the South Atlantic Anomaly. However, current and future commercial elec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, scattering rates would be higher at lower L, rather than the inverse as required by the data. A more likely candidate is scattering by shear Alfvén waves [Dragt, 1961;Shao et al, 2009] or, more generally, electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves [de Soria-Santacruz et al, 2013]. Measured distributions of H + or He + band EMIC waves [Saikin et al, 2015], extrapolated to lower L, may provide the necessary low average wave power.…”
Section: 1002/2015ja022154mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, scattering rates would be higher at lower L, rather than the inverse as required by the data. A more likely candidate is scattering by shear Alfvén waves [Dragt, 1961;Shao et al, 2009] or, more generally, electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves [de Soria-Santacruz et al, 2013]. Measured distributions of H + or He + band EMIC waves [Saikin et al, 2015], extrapolated to lower L, may provide the necessary low average wave power.…”
Section: 1002/2015ja022154mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radial and energy diffusion are ignorable because the frequency of the EMIC waves is well above the drift frequency and well below the gyrofrequency of the resonant particles [ Kennel , 1966]. The bounce-averaged diffusion equation for pure pitch angle scattering can be written as [ Davidson and Walt , 1977; Lyons , 1973; Lyons and Williams , 1984; Shao et al , 2009] where T ( α 0 )=1.3802−0.3198(sin( α 0 )+ sin1/2( α 0 )) is the normalized bounce time, f 0 is the trapped electron phase space density, α 0 is the equatorial pitch angle, 〈 D α α ( α 0 , E )〉 is the bounce-averaged pitch angle diffusion coefficient, and τ atm is the timescale for losses to the atmosphere. Assuming that losses occur only from within the loss cone and that the loss cone is emptied twice per bounce period, we take τ atm to be half of the bounce period inside the loss cone and infinite outside the loss cone [ Lyons , 1973; Davidson and Walt , 1977; Lyons and Williams , 1984; Shao et al , 2009].…”
Section: Diffusion Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the higher frequency range the excited waves are the EMIC waves, which play an important role in the plasma heating in the magnetosphere. A study of the interaction of hydromagnetic waves with trapped protons in the inner magnetosphere shows that the proton precipitation can be enhanced significantly [ Shao et al ., ]. The ELF waves excited by ionospheric heating, in particular the EMIC waves, are a possible source of the waves that can lead to such effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%