2016
DOI: 10.1038/ni.3386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of T cell antigen reactivity via programmed TCR downregulation

Abstract: The T cell receptor (TCR) is unique in that its affinity for ligand is unknown prior to encounter and can vary by orders of magnitude. How the immune system regulates individual T cells that display highly different reactivity to antigen remains unclear. Here we identified that activated CD4+ T cells, at the peak of clonal expansion, persistently downregulate TCR expression in proportion to the strength of initial antigen recognition. This programmed response increases the threshold for cytokine production and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
87
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding of Tet 499 TCR downregulation associated with a strong antitumor effect is also in contrast to a report showing that TCR downregulation limits their efficacy of controlling microbial infection (48). We reason that this is likely due to the difference of antigen level and antigen stimulation duration between microbial infections and tumor lesion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Our finding of Tet 499 TCR downregulation associated with a strong antitumor effect is also in contrast to a report showing that TCR downregulation limits their efficacy of controlling microbial infection (48). We reason that this is likely due to the difference of antigen level and antigen stimulation duration between microbial infections and tumor lesion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Higher avidity TCRs may give the D b NP 366 and D b PA 224 ‐specific CD8 + T cells a proliferative advantage during clonal expansion and also make tetramer binding more efficient. A recent study of CD4 + T cells showed that T cells of intermediate avidity made the greatest contribution to pathogen clearance as they were less subjected to control of antigen reactivity via TCR downregulation 37. Similarly, the recall response of the higher avidity D b PA 224 ‐specific CD8 + T cells may be suppressed in an effort to circumvent excessive damage to the host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of TF EPA (Association rule 4)No. of TF Promoter P -valueExperimental supportMonocytesIFN-gamma pathway51106.89 × 10 −4 [12]IL3-mediated signaling events46114.69 × 10 −3 [13]GMCSF-mediated signaling events43105.25 × 10 −3 [14]PDGF receptor signaling network4381.34 × 10 −2 [15]VEGF and VEGFR signaling network4492.10 × 10 −3 [16]CD4 + T cellIntegrin family cell surface interactions112132.59 × 10 −12 [17]IFN-gamma pathway107125.26 × 10 −12 [18]LKB1 signaling events107111.96 × 10 −12 [19]TCR signaling in naive CD4 + T cells103213.98 × 10 −8 [20]IL3-mediated signaling events10089.54 × 10 −13 [21]CD20 + B cellIntegrin family cell surface interactions6925.17 × 10 −11 [22]IL5-mediated signaling events6402.21 × 10 −11 [23]Insulin Pathway6303.15 × 10 −11 [24]mTOR signaling pathway6303.15 × 10 −11 [25]Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) pathway6303.15 × 10 −11 [26]Immune cell-related functional annotations were enriched more in ‘promoter and extended regions for enhancer-promoter association (EPA)’ than promoters. Five annotations are shown in each cell type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%