2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of solid oxide fuel cells damage using infrared thermography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4,26] Since the electrochemical performance of the SOFC cathode materials is related to the synthesis procedure, selection of electrolyte materials and the micro-structure of cathode layers, [5] the output power density and the durability of the BSCFW-0.05Mg single cell could be further optimized by introducing electrolyte into cathode material [27] and through wet chemical impregnation. [28] Scanning electron microscope (SEM) cross-sectional images (Figure S6, Supporting Information) of cells before and after aging prepared with x = 0.05 appear identical without interfacial contact issues including interfacial chemical reaction, [29] melting, [30] or delamination [31] between the SDC electrolyte and x = 0.05 cathode. No differences were observed in the cross-sectional SEM images between the aged and unaged cells prepared from undoped BSCFW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4,26] Since the electrochemical performance of the SOFC cathode materials is related to the synthesis procedure, selection of electrolyte materials and the micro-structure of cathode layers, [5] the output power density and the durability of the BSCFW-0.05Mg single cell could be further optimized by introducing electrolyte into cathode material [27] and through wet chemical impregnation. [28] Scanning electron microscope (SEM) cross-sectional images (Figure S6, Supporting Information) of cells before and after aging prepared with x = 0.05 appear identical without interfacial contact issues including interfacial chemical reaction, [29] melting, [30] or delamination [31] between the SDC electrolyte and x = 0.05 cathode. No differences were observed in the cross-sectional SEM images between the aged and unaged cells prepared from undoped BSCFW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning electron microscope (SEM) cross‐sectional images (Figure S6, Supporting Information) of cells before and after aging prepared with x = 0.05 appear identical without interfacial contact issues including interfacial chemical reaction, [ 29 ] melting, [ 30 ] or delamination [ 31 ] between the SDC electrolyte and x = 0.05 cathode. No differences were observed in the cross‐sectional SEM images between the aged and unaged cells prepared from undoped BSCFW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of quantitative analysis of temperature distribution by pulsed infrared thermography, 15,16 El-Amiri et al, obtained crack initiation information, and crack propagation was simulated in electrolyte/anodesupported planar SOFCs. 17 Furthermore, the mechanism of crack initiation and degradation for planar SOFC at high working temperature was obtained, and crack initiation in the anode-electrolyte interface was concluded by Kim et al 18 Xie et al show that the edge of cell is more prone to cracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the studies currently available, some fuel cell internal leakage diagnostic methods have been already developed, such as the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), , the cross-current diagnostics, , the voltage difference diagnostics, , the cathode outlet hydrogen concentration diagnostics, , and the thermography diagnostics. , However, with advances in technology and increased complexity, diagnostic strategies have begun to move in a more advanced and intelligent phase. Figure shows a flowchart of three diagnostic methods for fuel cell internal leakage in FCVs: (1) the machine learning-based leakage diagnosis, (2) the signal processing-based leakage diagnosis, and (3) the leakage diagnosis based on sensor fusion and multimodal methods.…”
Section: Leakage Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%