2001
DOI: 10.1109/87.896743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of seismically excited vibration using electrorheological materials and Lyapunov methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 . Especially the fairly better control performance on the absolute acceleration of each floor is achieved with the predictive semi-active control compared to that achieved with the he semi-active control law proposed in (Gavin, 2001). This result indicates that the importance of the proposed integrated design approach, i.e., the design of the structural system (the control object) with taking the employed control law into consideration.…”
Section: Design Examplementioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 . Especially the fairly better control performance on the absolute acceleration of each floor is achieved with the predictive semi-active control compared to that achieved with the he semi-active control law proposed in (Gavin, 2001). This result indicates that the importance of the proposed integrated design approach, i.e., the design of the structural system (the control object) with taking the employed control law into consideration.…”
Section: Design Examplementioning
confidence: 82%
“…str.)) shows the better performance on vibration suppression compared to that of the semi-active control proposed by (Gavin, 2001) (Energy-based SA (Opt. str.))…”
Section: Design Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of the method was not to decrease the amplitude of system vibration, as many researchers have sought to accomplish in the past (Karnopp et al, 1974;Gavin, 2001), but rather to increase it. In the aforementioned study, the variable damping coefficient was harmonically varied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, semiactive control is simple, has low energy consumption, and is safe against failure of the control element compared to active control that is realized by sensors, a (feedback) controller, and actuators requiring a large power supply. Because of the above advantages, semiactive control has been actively studied as a vibration control method for structural systems subject to large-scale earthquake disturbances in which surrounding power failure can be occurred [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%