1974
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.122.1.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Scattered Radiation by Air Gap Techniques: Applications to Chest Radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SI Appendix , Fig. S4 ), which is consistent with the well-known use of air gap techniques ( 33 ) as alternatives to antiscatter grids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…SI Appendix , Fig. S4 ), which is consistent with the well-known use of air gap techniques ( 33 ) as alternatives to antiscatter grids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It enhances image quality, which might make it possible to detect even small changes in valve settings. 12,31 This would be beneficial to the patients´ health even with the increased radiation dose. 24 The three highest scoring imaging techniques are C, B, and H, counting for a 65% of the total scores (table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scatter was reduced by an air gap between the phantom and the detector surface, which ranged from 24 cm to 30 cm. According to the study by Gould and Hale (1974), for 100 kV, 30 cm x30 cm field, and absorber thickness of 20 cm (water), an air gap of 26 cm provided a contrast improvement factor of 2.2. In comparison, a 7:1 antiscatter grid provides a contrast improvement factor of 2.1.…”
Section: Phantom Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%