2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46574-6_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Reaction-Diffusion Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the coupling matrix B is not invertible, expression (7) for f Gold cannot be used. The question arises how to extend our approach to underactuated systems [37,55]. In the following example we assume a control acting on the activator u only while inhibitors v and w remain uncontrolled, i.e., f v,Gold (r, t) = f w,Gold (r, t) = 0.…”
Section: Position Control By a Single Control Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the coupling matrix B is not invertible, expression (7) for f Gold cannot be used. The question arises how to extend our approach to underactuated systems [37,55]. In the following example we assume a control acting on the activator u only while inhibitors v and w remain uncontrolled, i.e., f v,Gold (r, t) = f w,Gold (r, t) = 0.…”
Section: Position Control By a Single Control Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the coupling matrix B is not invertible, expression (7) for f Gold cannot be used. The question arises how to extend our approach to underactuated systems [36,52]. In the following example we assume a control acting on the activator u only while inhibitors v and w remain uncontrolled, i.e., f v,Gold (r, t) = f w,Gold (r, t) = 0.…”
Section: Position Control By a Single Control Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%