1981
DOI: 10.1093/nar/9.19.4863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of promoter utilization by bacteriophage T4-induced modification of RNA polymerase α subunit

Abstract: After infection of Escherichia coli cells, bacteriophage T4 induces several changes in the host DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. A well-characterized chemical change is a two-step ADP-ribosylation of the enzyme's alpha subunit (1). In order to investigate the effect of this change on RNA polymerase transcriptional properties in an in vitro system, we have reconstituted the enzyme from separated individual subunits which were obtained from normal or T4-modified RNA polymerases. It is demonstrated that the enzymes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has long been known that purified T4‐modified RNA polymerase is much less efficient than the unmodified enzyme in transcribing bacteriophage T4 DNA in vitro , suggesting that one or more of these modifications is the cause of the early gene shut‐off. A number of studies aimed at understanding the molecular basis of this change in polymerase activity have involved core‐associated (ADP ribosylation and the RpbA protein) as well as sigma‐associated (AsiA) modifications (Seifert et al ., 1969; Khesin et al ., 1972; Stevens and Rhoton, 1975; Khesin et al ., 1976; Goldfarb, 1981; Goldfarb and Palm, 1981; Malik and Goldfarb, 1984; Drivdahl and Kutter, 1990). Our analysis with the double mutants shows that eliminating AsiA together with RpbA, Mod, MotB or MotA is without consequence for early gene shut‐off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been known that purified T4‐modified RNA polymerase is much less efficient than the unmodified enzyme in transcribing bacteriophage T4 DNA in vitro , suggesting that one or more of these modifications is the cause of the early gene shut‐off. A number of studies aimed at understanding the molecular basis of this change in polymerase activity have involved core‐associated (ADP ribosylation and the RpbA protein) as well as sigma‐associated (AsiA) modifications (Seifert et al ., 1969; Khesin et al ., 1972; Stevens and Rhoton, 1975; Khesin et al ., 1976; Goldfarb, 1981; Goldfarb and Palm, 1981; Malik and Goldfarb, 1984; Drivdahl and Kutter, 1990). Our analysis with the double mutants shows that eliminating AsiA together with RpbA, Mod, MotB or MotA is without consequence for early gene shut‐off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several lines of evidence indicate that to do so, the phage upregulates expression of IF2 while downregulating expression of IF3, thus stimulating translation of leaderless mRNA [155, 156]. Another example is the well-studied E. coli -infecting T4 phage which encodes ADP-ribosyltransferases, like ModB, which ribosylates host proteins involved in translation [157, 158]. No evidence is available yet on their influence on translation.…”
Section: Phage-encoded Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results support previous findings (60,73) that ADP-ribosylation catalyzed by Alt enhances transcription from T4 early promoters, possibly by outcompeting transcription initiated at host promoters. The ModA-catalyzed modification of host RNA polymerase prevents transcription from host promoters that carry an UP element (18,53) and from T4 early promoters (21). However, since residual transcription was observed on all templates after ModA modification of RNA polymerase and since the initially low transcription of E. coli DNA was hardly reduced upon modification (Table 2), we concluded that the ModA-induced modification is not sufficient to prevent host transcription.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It has been inferred that the differences in the molecular masses of gpAlt (76 kDa) and gpModA (23 kDa) might be responsible for the different approaches to the ␣ subunits. The ModAinduced ADP-ribosylation of ␣ subunits inhibits transcription from T4 early promoters (21). Host polymerase may thus be conditioned to interact with other T4-encoded transcription factors that may be active in the middle mode (14,27,28,68) or late transcription (26,74,75,76).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%