2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.043001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Population Flow in Coherently Driven Quantum Ladders

Abstract: A technique for adiabatic control of the population flow through a preselected decaying excited level in a three-level quantum ladder is presented. The population flow through the intermediate or upper level is controlled efficiently and robustly by varying the pulse delay between a pair of partly overlapping coherent laser pulses. The technique is analyzed theoretically and demonstrated in an experiment with Na2 molecules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, when there is no overlap or the P-laser field precedes the S field d Ͼ 0, excitation flows almost entirely through the intermediate level e. The population that flows through level f will decay to other levels, including level e. For our level scheme according to previous calculations, 14 a fraction of about r = 0.35 of the molecules which are excited to level f will decay to level e. The population dynamics takes place during the relevant time interval that begins with the arrival of the P pulse and ends within T flow ϳ f , where i =1/⌫ i is the total spontaneous emission rate from level i. 6 Since the lifetime f is much shorter than the pulse duration, after spontaneous transitions from level f to level e the S-laser intensity is still large, while the P-laser intensity is small. Thus, the strong S laser will induce damped Rabi oscillations between levels e and f with a frequency that is much larger than the level decay rates ⌫ i =1/ i .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of course, when there is no overlap or the P-laser field precedes the S field d Ͼ 0, excitation flows almost entirely through the intermediate level e. The population that flows through level f will decay to other levels, including level e. For our level scheme according to previous calculations, 14 a fraction of about r = 0.35 of the molecules which are excited to level f will decay to level e. The population dynamics takes place during the relevant time interval that begins with the arrival of the P pulse and ends within T flow ϳ f , where i =1/⌫ i is the total spontaneous emission rate from level i. 6 Since the lifetime f is much shorter than the pulse duration, after spontaneous transitions from level f to level e the S-laser intensity is still large, while the P-laser intensity is small. Thus, the strong S laser will induce damped Rabi oscillations between levels e and f with a frequency that is much larger than the level decay rates ⌫ i =1/ i .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Now we put them on an absolute scale and add some numerical simulation. Unlike the signal from level f, the normalization of the signal from level e is not possible with the current experimental setup for reasons discussed in Sec.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For robust and efficient controlling of population transfer between quantum states, many novel strategies have been proposed and exploited by several authors. Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STI-RAP) [3][4][5][6], adiabatic rapid passage (ARP) [7], Raman chirped adiabatic passage (RCAP) [8][9][10], and temporal coherent control (TCC) [11,12], etc., are some of the well-known methods. Recently, the field of coherent control of atoms and molecules has received a tremendous boost owing to the recent progress in the generation of femtosecond and attosecond laser pulses and its possible future applications [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%