1981
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.198100056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Photosynthetic Electron Transfer from the Reaction Center to Electron Carriers of Photosystem II Studied by Fluorescence Induction

Abstract: Abstract. The relationships between the primary electron acceptor (0) and the secondary pool (AI) are examined from fluorescence induction curves, at various illumination times and relaxation dark times. The fast-phase in the fluorescence rise curve, obtained after insufficient relaxation time, indicates the occurrence of "unconnected" 0, i.e. the reaction between 0-and AI is blocked. Various treatments bring about similar disconnection: high pH, ethylene glycol, low temperature (all reversible), trypsin and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 30-60% EG range, there is a reversible slowing in the Q Arecombination kinetics (Table 1) as well as a reversible loss in the nanosecond kinetics for P680 + reduction (Figure 6). One possible explanation for these effects may be that EG causes a lowering of the midpoint potentials of the intermediate S n states and/or of the electron acceptor side (Malkin, 1981). Earlier work has shown, for example, that the S 2 state in PSII samples prepared without the 33 kDa protein (Miyao et al, 1987) and in 33 kDa (psbO) deletion mutants (Philbrick et al, 1991;Burnap et al, 1992) has a much higher stability, presumably because of altered solvent interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 30-60% EG range, there is a reversible slowing in the Q Arecombination kinetics (Table 1) as well as a reversible loss in the nanosecond kinetics for P680 + reduction (Figure 6). One possible explanation for these effects may be that EG causes a lowering of the midpoint potentials of the intermediate S n states and/or of the electron acceptor side (Malkin, 1981). Earlier work has shown, for example, that the S 2 state in PSII samples prepared without the 33 kDa protein (Miyao et al, 1987) and in 33 kDa (psbO) deletion mutants (Philbrick et al, 1991;Burnap et al, 1992) has a much higher stability, presumably because of altered solvent interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%