2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1006-706x(13)60190-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Macrosegregation Behavior by Applying Final Electromagnetic Stirring for Continuously Cast High Carbon Steel Billet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, many actions have been taken to improve the internal quality of casting billets, such as electromagnetic stirring (EMS) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], soft reduction, etc. Most of the actions taken are to enlarge the equiaxed zone and dismiss the shrinkage so that the segregation could be inhibited effectively [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many actions have been taken to improve the internal quality of casting billets, such as electromagnetic stirring (EMS) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], soft reduction, etc. Most of the actions taken are to enlarge the equiaxed zone and dismiss the shrinkage so that the segregation could be inhibited effectively [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, it is difficult to expect an answer on the basis of a theoretical model only, and, therefore, experimental tests are still very relevant, both on a laboratory scale and an industrial scale. The published information [4][5][6][7][8][9] concerning the positive influence of electromagnetic stirrers on the reduction of carbon segregation in the continuous steel casting process shows that the mentioned direction of actions is very promising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, secondary cooling and F-EMS are conventionally treated as two independent technologies without considering their interaction, and their parameters are generally optimized separately [2][3][4]. In the conventional model, secondary cooling water flows are determined by steel grade and size of billet and optimized as functions of casting speed for a specific caster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the changing situation, if stirring parameters remain unchanged, obviously the F-EMS cannot play a proper role to keep the stability of solidification or even cause side effects. However, to keep the stability of the liquid core just by adjusting the secondary cooling water flows, that may lead to excessive temperature deviations from the target value and cause cracks and other quality problems [2]. Otherwise, if stirring parameters change according to the size area of the liquid core at F-EMS position without adjusting the water flows, as the liquid core is too big or too small, FEMS also cannot achieve its proper role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%