2008
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200811065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Lacustrine Phytoplankton by Nutrients: Erosion of the Phosphorus Paradigm

Abstract: Control of lacustrine phytoplankton biomass by phosphorus is one of the oldest and most stable paradigms in modern limnology. Even so, evidence from bioassays conducted by multiple investigators at numerous sites over the last three decades shows that N is at least as likely as P to be limiting to phytoplankton growth. A number of important flaws in the evidence supporting the phosphorus paradigm have contributed to an unrealistic degree of focus on phosphorus as a controlling element. These include insufficie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
241
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
16
241
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, some research argue that P is the ultimate limiting nutrient overtime since N 2 fixation helps satisfy N requirements (Schindler et al 2008). In fact, N limitation has been observed in whole-lake experiments and many studies have indicated that N 2 fixation by phytoplankton cannot fully compensate for nitrogen deficiency (Kolzau et al 2014;Lewis and Wurtsbaugh 2008;Paerl 2009;Scott and McCarthy 2010). This is mainly because the process is controlled by lots of physical-chemical factors except for N/P ratio (Paerl 2009).…”
Section: Environmental Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some research argue that P is the ultimate limiting nutrient overtime since N 2 fixation helps satisfy N requirements (Schindler et al 2008). In fact, N limitation has been observed in whole-lake experiments and many studies have indicated that N 2 fixation by phytoplankton cannot fully compensate for nitrogen deficiency (Kolzau et al 2014;Lewis and Wurtsbaugh 2008;Paerl 2009;Scott and McCarthy 2010). This is mainly because the process is controlled by lots of physical-chemical factors except for N/P ratio (Paerl 2009).…”
Section: Environmental Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paterson et al (2011) misinterpret the increase in heterocyte abundance as a signal that the phytoplankton have overcome N deficiency. The mere presence of heterocystous cyanobacteria does not indicate that N fixation is meeting phytoplankton N demand (Lewis and Wurtsbaugh 2008). If N-fixing cyanobacteria were supplying N at a rate proportional to P fertilization, TN concentrations would remain constant or increase relative to TP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment, Schindler et al (2008) asserted that nitrogen demand of a lake can be met by its nitrogen fixers (e.g., cyanobacteria) and, therefore, eutrophication cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input. This assertion has been questioned, however, and multiple nutrient management strategies have been proposed by other scientists (Lewis & Wurtsbaugh 2008;Paerl et al 2011). The challenge, then, is to determine how phytoplankton growth is limited by different nutrients (i.e., N, P, or trace metals) in various ecosystems (Hecky & Kilham 1988;Martin & Fitzwater 1988;Beardall et al 2001;Elser et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%