“…A striking characteristic of the response to EGF was its heterogeneity from cell to cell, which is evident for each parameter studied (lag time, number and duration of the single transients, duration of the oscillatory response, interspike interval). A large variability has already been described for the Ca 2þ oscillations induced by EGF in rat hepatocytes (Tanaka et al, 1992) and human A431 cells (Cheyette and Gross, 1991) and could be accounted for by a number of mechanisms: (1) heterogeneity in the phase of the cell cycle, which could shift from G 0 towards G 1 under the dispersed conditions of the primary culture (Nakamura and Ichihara, 1985) and cause different rates of sphingosine kinase activity between nonoscillating (in G 0 ) and oscillating (in G 1 ) cells, as proposed for the Ca 2þ signals induced by PDGF-BB in transformed oligodentrocytes Miller, 1996, 1999); (2) wide variation from cell to cell, even from the same coverslip, in the number of EGF-R (Cheyette and Gross, 1991) or in their binding properties (Chung et al, 1997); (3) variability in the expression of low-affinity EGF-R, which might be responsible for EGF-elicited Ca 2þ influx (Defize et al, 1989) and, therefore, for the maintained response to the growth factor (see below). The first mechanism seems to be ruled out by preliminary experiments in which the application of 10, 20, and 25 ng/ml EGF to serum-deprived CMEC resulted in patterns of response similar to those described in presence of 10% serum in the growing medium (see Materials and Methods).…”