2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.02.130039
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of filament length by a depolymerizing gradient

Abstract: 5Cells assemble microns-long filamentous structures from protein monomers that are nanometers 6 in size. These structures are often highly dynamic, yet in order for them to function properly, 7 cells maintain precise filament lengths. In this paper, we investigate length dependent 8 depolymerization as a mechanism of length control. This mechanism has been recently proposed 9 for flagellar length control in the single cell organisms Chlamydomonas and Giardia. Length 10 dependent depolymerization can arise from… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of one stochastic model, in which both IFT entry and the random walk of returning IFT motors are explicitly modeled as random processes, allowed for prediction of fluctuations in length, but the predicted noise, assuming that the source of noise is addition and removal of single tubulins, was much smaller than what we have observed in the present study (Datta et al, 2020). This result is consistent with the calculations reported in Figure 1F, indicating that the magnitude of fluctuations in Figure 1C would require that these fluctuations involve large numbers of tubulins being added or removed during one step.…”
Section: Using Noise To Test Length Control Modelscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Analysis of one stochastic model, in which both IFT entry and the random walk of returning IFT motors are explicitly modeled as random processes, allowed for prediction of fluctuations in length, but the predicted noise, assuming that the source of noise is addition and removal of single tubulins, was much smaller than what we have observed in the present study (Datta et al, 2020). This result is consistent with the calculations reported in Figure 1F, indicating that the magnitude of fluctuations in Figure 1C would require that these fluctuations involve large numbers of tubulins being added or removed during one step.…”
Section: Using Noise To Test Length Control Modelscontrasting
confidence: 55%