1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0144-8609(96)01012-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of feed dispensation in seacages using underwater video monitoring: effects on growth and food conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 presents the fish mean weight at the beginning and end of the experiment, as well as the total biomass produced, feed intake, and feed conversion rate for each tank of the two treatments analyzed in this work. It can be seen that feed conversion rate in treatment 1 was 2.26, while in treatment 2 it was 1.54; consequently a 29.10% (equivalent to 105.3 kg) of food was saved in treatment 2 where the feeder with fuzzy-logic control was used for fish feeding, despite the growth potential of fish population was supported with the food provided rations, therefore, the feeder with fuzzy-logic control provides precise food quantities (Ang and Petrell 1997). These results substantiate the possibility of using a feeder with fuzzy-logic control for food management in intensive aquaculture systems, in order to minimize water pollution, save food (reduce the feed conversion rate), and accordingly avoid economic losses.…”
Section: Fuzzy-logic Control Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 presents the fish mean weight at the beginning and end of the experiment, as well as the total biomass produced, feed intake, and feed conversion rate for each tank of the two treatments analyzed in this work. It can be seen that feed conversion rate in treatment 1 was 2.26, while in treatment 2 it was 1.54; consequently a 29.10% (equivalent to 105.3 kg) of food was saved in treatment 2 where the feeder with fuzzy-logic control was used for fish feeding, despite the growth potential of fish population was supported with the food provided rations, therefore, the feeder with fuzzy-logic control provides precise food quantities (Ang and Petrell 1997). These results substantiate the possibility of using a feeder with fuzzy-logic control for food management in intensive aquaculture systems, in order to minimize water pollution, save food (reduce the feed conversion rate), and accordingly avoid economic losses.…”
Section: Fuzzy-logic Control Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Competition behaviors are reduced if all fish are fed similarly throughout the tank, giving wide access to food (Jobling et al 1995). A food ration is adequate if it is consumed with little waste and supports the potential growth of fish population (Ang and Petrell 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are ways in which such variation can be accommodated in fish farming. When fish are fed manually, signs that the fish are becoming sated, such as reduced response to feed, can be used to decide when to stop feed delivery, but this may be inaccurate as subsurface feeding may be taking place even though surface feeding has ceased (Juell 1995;Ang & Petrell 1997;Talbot et al 1999). Some automated feed delivery systems can be programmed to match what is known about natural variation in feeding activity, over a range of time scales.…”
Section: Solutions To Problems For Fish Culture Arising From Natural mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such feed delivery systems take fluctuations in fish appetite into account, something that is not done by preprogrammed, timed-release automatic feeders that deliver predetermined amounts of feed each day. Appetite-based demand feeders are of two kinds (Chapter 3), self-feeders, in which fish obtain food by pulling, pushing or biting a trigger (Alanärä 1992b), and interactive feedback systems; these detect either fish feeding activity or waste feed using infra-red sensors (Blyth et al 1993), underwater video-cameras (Ang & Petrell 1997) or hydro-acoustic instruments (Juell 1991;Summerfelt et al 1995) and then adjust feed delivery accordingly (Houlihan et al 2001;Le François et al 2010). Feeding by means of operant self-feeders has been used successfully for a number of species, including rainbow trout (Landless 1976;Alanärä 1994Alanärä , 1996, European seabass (Sánchez-Vázquez et al 1994), Atlantic salmon (Paspatis & Boujard 1996) and yellowtail (Kohbara et al 2003).…”
Section: Appetite-based Demand Feeding Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In interactive feedback systems, the amount of feed delivered is regulated by the amount of feed waste and the number of uneaten pellets. Feed waste can be estimated by using an infra-red pellet sensor (Blyth et al 1993) or a camera-based pellet detection (Ang and Petrell 1997). In this review, we present the results of representative studies that use demand feeders in both laboratory and production conditions, outlining the aspects that could be interesting for those who want to improve welfare in farmed fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%