2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-012-9194-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of dead-time systems using derivative free local search guided population based incremental learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the tuning factors and the value of the performance index, ISE are tabulated in Table .1. Readers are directed to refer to Kanthaswamy and Jovitha (2012) for IMF and SDPS-based PID and Smith PID schemes derived for all the case studies discussed in this paper. The IMF method when used alone failed for the case of the PID controller, while SDPS found close optimal solution independently without StudGA.…”
Section: Control Of Integrating Processes With Time Delay (Iptd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of the tuning factors and the value of the performance index, ISE are tabulated in Table .1. Readers are directed to refer to Kanthaswamy and Jovitha (2012) for IMF and SDPS-based PID and Smith PID schemes derived for all the case studies discussed in this paper. The IMF method when used alone failed for the case of the PID controller, while SDPS found close optimal solution independently without StudGA.…”
Section: Control Of Integrating Processes With Time Delay (Iptd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows that the results of PID and Smith PID controllers are not convergent using IMF (Kanthaswamy and Jovitha, 2012) and SDPS working independently. Both methods fail when used independently without an initial starting point guided by StudGA.…”
Section: Control Of An Unstable Processmentioning
confidence: 99%