1996
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/47.4.529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of crops leaf growth by chemical and hydraulic influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, control plants grown in flooded conditions maintained comparatively high leaf productivities. Leaf sensitivity to low water conditions is fairly common in plants (Puliga et al 1996, Milnes et al 1998. In a microcosm study on drought and wetland macrophytes, both J. americana and S. cernuus had significant reductions in leaf area following simulated drought conditions, with J. americana appearing to be more sensitive than S. cernuus-as indicated by an 85% reduction in leaf area for J. americana 5 wk after experiencing a 2 wk drought .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, control plants grown in flooded conditions maintained comparatively high leaf productivities. Leaf sensitivity to low water conditions is fairly common in plants (Puliga et al 1996, Milnes et al 1998. In a microcosm study on drought and wetland macrophytes, both J. americana and S. cernuus had significant reductions in leaf area following simulated drought conditions, with J. americana appearing to be more sensitive than S. cernuus-as indicated by an 85% reduction in leaf area for J. americana 5 wk after experiencing a 2 wk drought .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLANT RESPONSES TO SOIL DRYING AND RE-WATERING Leaf growth of the two species studied showed a similar sensitivity to a 15-20 day period of soil drying, both in terms of responses over time and in relation to the soil moisture contents measured. Growth of B. media and K. macrantha was moderately sensitive to soil drying compared with species studied by Puliga et al (1996). 50% and 100% inhibition of growth occurred at times and values for moisture loss intermediate between Festuca arundinacea, a temperate grass species which is sensitive to soil drying, and Eragrostis curvula, a warm-season grass in which leaf growth was comparatively insensitive to soil drying.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…, 2004) and numerous other studies where parameters such as osmotic adjustment and leaf growth have been evaluated in a number of crop species (see for example Babu et al. , 1999; Puliga et al. , 1996).…”
Section: Experimental Techniques For Evaluating the Low‐ψw Responsementioning
confidence: 99%