“…Chromium may be absorbed by plant roots as Cr(III) or Cr(VI), it is poorly translocated and largely retained in roots, independently of Cr form that has been taken up [26,31,32]. The two ions do not share a common uptake mechanism: the uptake of Cr(III) is largely a passive process, whereas the uptake of Cr(VI) is mediated by low affinity sulphate carriers, specific for the uptake of essential metals [29,30,33,34] and quickly converted to Cr(III) in roots by Fe(III) reductase enzymes [31].…”
Section: Chromium In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in bean, only 0.1% of the total Cr accumulated was found in the seeds while 98% remained in the roots [29,33]. Even though the tendency to retain Cr in roots is common to all plant species studied thus far by various workers, there are quantitative differences among plant species in this regard [32]: the highest concentrations of Cr were found in species of the Brassicaceae family [31].…”
A category of chromium (Cr)-containing fertilizers is represented by the fertilizers deriving from byproducts of tanning process. Their use is widespread because of their good agronomic response due to the high content of slow release or- ganic nitrogen (N) and carbon (C). They do not represent an environmental hazard because only the non-toxic form of Cr(III) is present. Productive processes may involve chemical, enzymatic or thermal hydrolysis. The final product is characterized by different contents of peptides and free amino acids depending on the type of hydrolysis. Legislation concerning Cr-containing fertilizers is controversial because often do not consider any scientific evidences; nevertheless, the European Union, the United States and countries as Italy, do not set the restriction to Cr(III) and generally only the presence of the toxic form, Cr(VI), is limited. Depending on its two main oxidation forms, Cr issue has been studied for many years. Several authors confirmed that Cr(VI) is carcinogenic, while Cr(III) is an essential trace element in human and animal diet. In soil Cr(III) has low mobility, whereas Cr(VI) is highly water soluble. However Cr(VI) in soil is quickly reduced to Cr(III); on the contrary oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) is rarely possible because particular conditions must occur. Only a very small fraction of Cr in soil is available to plant uptake and its translocation in edible parts is limited because it is immobilized in roots as Cr(III). Therefore risks of environmental pollution using these fertilizers are negligible; on the contrary they have positive environmental and agronomical effects. The aim of this review is to deal with the category of the organic fertilizers containing Cr derived from tannery processes focusing on its chemical, productive, legislative, environmental and agronomical aspects. Special attention is given to the ambiguous issue of Cr briefly summarizing the most important studies of the last forty years.
“…Chromium may be absorbed by plant roots as Cr(III) or Cr(VI), it is poorly translocated and largely retained in roots, independently of Cr form that has been taken up [26,31,32]. The two ions do not share a common uptake mechanism: the uptake of Cr(III) is largely a passive process, whereas the uptake of Cr(VI) is mediated by low affinity sulphate carriers, specific for the uptake of essential metals [29,30,33,34] and quickly converted to Cr(III) in roots by Fe(III) reductase enzymes [31].…”
Section: Chromium In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in bean, only 0.1% of the total Cr accumulated was found in the seeds while 98% remained in the roots [29,33]. Even though the tendency to retain Cr in roots is common to all plant species studied thus far by various workers, there are quantitative differences among plant species in this regard [32]: the highest concentrations of Cr were found in species of the Brassicaceae family [31].…”
A category of chromium (Cr)-containing fertilizers is represented by the fertilizers deriving from byproducts of tanning process. Their use is widespread because of their good agronomic response due to the high content of slow release or- ganic nitrogen (N) and carbon (C). They do not represent an environmental hazard because only the non-toxic form of Cr(III) is present. Productive processes may involve chemical, enzymatic or thermal hydrolysis. The final product is characterized by different contents of peptides and free amino acids depending on the type of hydrolysis. Legislation concerning Cr-containing fertilizers is controversial because often do not consider any scientific evidences; nevertheless, the European Union, the United States and countries as Italy, do not set the restriction to Cr(III) and generally only the presence of the toxic form, Cr(VI), is limited. Depending on its two main oxidation forms, Cr issue has been studied for many years. Several authors confirmed that Cr(VI) is carcinogenic, while Cr(III) is an essential trace element in human and animal diet. In soil Cr(III) has low mobility, whereas Cr(VI) is highly water soluble. However Cr(VI) in soil is quickly reduced to Cr(III); on the contrary oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) is rarely possible because particular conditions must occur. Only a very small fraction of Cr in soil is available to plant uptake and its translocation in edible parts is limited because it is immobilized in roots as Cr(III). Therefore risks of environmental pollution using these fertilizers are negligible; on the contrary they have positive environmental and agronomical effects. The aim of this review is to deal with the category of the organic fertilizers containing Cr derived from tannery processes focusing on its chemical, productive, legislative, environmental and agronomical aspects. Special attention is given to the ambiguous issue of Cr briefly summarizing the most important studies of the last forty years.
“…There are reports that Fe-and P-deficient plants can better transport Cr from roots to shoots. [24,40] Iron-and P-deficiency induce accumulation of organic acids (i.e. citric acid), [41] which may play an important role in Cr translocation.…”
Section: Davies Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] Chromium concentration was greatest in the roots, intermediate in shoots and lowest in leaves. Chromium is predominately accumulated in plant roots, [24] and in Thlaspi sp. was reported to be immobilized in the roots.…”
Section: Davies Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that Cr predominantly exists in two forms in soil: as a trivalent cation {( [21,22,23] Chromium (III) readily precipitates in soil, whereas greater environmental pollution problems occur with the more mobile and toxic Cr(VI). [24,25] Hence, this research was conducted to determine the effects of Glomus intraradices (Schenck and Smith) in the phytoremediation of Cr using sunflower seedlings (Helianthus annuus L.). Sunflower is a high biomass plant with high metal accumulating ability, but low Cr tolerance compared to other agronomic crops.…”
As a potential phytoremediation system for phytoextraction of chromium (Cr), we evaluated the influence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices on leaf tissue elemental composition, growth and gas exchange of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Sunflower seedlings were either inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi (AM) or non-inoculated (Non-AM) and then exposed to two Cr species: {12 mmol of trivalent cation (Cr þ3 ) [Cr(III)] or 0.1 mmol of divalent dichromate anion (Cr 2 O 7 À ) [Cr(VI)]}. Both Cr species depressed plant growth, decreased stomatal conductance (g s ) and net photosynthesis (A).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.