2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-019-0592-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Axially Moving Systems: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with other non-invasive neuroimaging modalities (i.e., fMRI, EEG, and MEG), fNIRS has the advantages of safety, lower cost, portability, tolerance of motion artifacts, good temporal resolution, and moderate spatial resolution [16]. Additionally, the development of initial dip detection [17][18][19], bundled-optodes configurations [20][21][22][23], and adaptive algorithms [24][25][26][27] have offered further opportunities to improve the temporal and spatial resolution of fNIRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with other non-invasive neuroimaging modalities (i.e., fMRI, EEG, and MEG), fNIRS has the advantages of safety, lower cost, portability, tolerance of motion artifacts, good temporal resolution, and moderate spatial resolution [16]. Additionally, the development of initial dip detection [17][18][19], bundled-optodes configurations [20][21][22][23], and adaptive algorithms [24][25][26][27] have offered further opportunities to improve the temporal and spatial resolution of fNIRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, fNIRS is a novel neuroimaging modality with the following advantages: it is non-invasive, safe, less costly, portable, and tolerant of motion artifacts (Perrey, 2008); it also has great temporal resolution and moderate spatial resolution (Ghafoor et al, 2017;Zafar and Hong, 2020). In addition, fNIRS is in progress to improve the spatial and temporal resolutions with the development of bundled-optodes configurations , detection of the initial dip (Zafar and Hong, 2017;Hong and Zafar, 2018), and combination of adaptive method (Iqbal et al, 2018;Hong and Pham, 2019;Pamosoaji et al, 2019) to improve information transfer rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, EEG is limited in simultaneous use with the brain stimulation device because recorded signals affect the electric and magnetic fields. However, specific signal-processing algorithms can remove interference components, such as principal component analysis, independent component analysis, and adaptive filter algorithms ( Deng et al, 2019 ; Hong and Pham, 2019 ; Yoo, 2019 ; Park et al, 2020 ). Thus, a technique free of limitation, such as a noninvasive neuroimaging modality (i.e., fNIRS), as a promising method, should be considered the first choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%