2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574714000745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of a compass gait walker based on energy regulation using ankle push-off and foot placement

Abstract: In this paper, we present a theoretical study on the control of a compass gait walker using energy regulation between steps. We use a return map to relate the mid-stance robot kinetic energy between steps with two control inputs, namely, foot placement and ankle push-off. We show that by regulating robot kinetic energy between steps using the two control inputs, we are able to (1) generate a wide range of walking speeds and stride lengths, including average human walking; (2) cancel the effect of external dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example: Controlling a bipedal walking robot For a 2D bipedal robot walking at steady speed, here is how we can go about designing a discrete controller [23]. A typical walking step of a bipedal robots includes two phases: a smooth continuous phase in which the entire robot vaults over the grounded leg, and a non-smooth discontinuous phase in which the legs exchange roles.…”
Section: Schematic Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example: Controlling a bipedal walking robot For a 2D bipedal robot walking at steady speed, here is how we can go about designing a discrete controller [23]. A typical walking step of a bipedal robots includes two phases: a smooth continuous phase in which the entire robot vaults over the grounded leg, and a non-smooth discontinuous phase in which the legs exchange roles.…”
Section: Schematic Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when c ¼ 1, the convergence is in a single step. This is achieved by taking a bigger than nominal step as reduction in velocity between steps is directly proportional to the step length [19,22]. But a bigger step will lead to flight phase at a lower velocity (see Eq.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the point mass torso is heavy compared to the legs, the swing leg motion cannot affect the stance leg motion in the swing phase, and the system is thus decoupled. However, the swing leg (actuated degree-of-freedom) motion can influence the stance leg (unactuated degree-of-freedom) motion by appropriate foot placement (e.g., big step reduces the stance leg velocity [19]), which is exploited in the DCLF approach. Figure 2 shows a cartoon of the simplest walker [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the capabilities of the PCG model on uneven terrain using a torque at the hip and an impulsive toe-off control was investigated in Byl and Tedrake (2008). Impulsive input applied at toe-off immediately before heel strike was also studied separately by Bhounsule (2015) and Kuo (2002). Van Der Linde (1998) extended the PCG model with radial spring actuation on the stance leg, activated during mid-stance by instantaneously changing its stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%