2013
DOI: 10.1177/1077546313505634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of a class of nonsmooth dynamical systems

Abstract: In this paper, the authors propose an approach to control a class of nonsmooth continuous and discontinuous dynamical systems which is based on a generalization of derivative and Chebyshev pseudospectral (PS) methods. First a generalized derivative for nonsmooth functions, which is proposed by Kamyad et al. is considered. Therefore the obtained generalized derivative of a nonsmooth function is approximated with the Fourier series. So, the nonsmooth control problem is approximated by a smooth optimal control pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modification of the PS methods permits to prove sufficient conditions for feasibility and convergence of the approximate solution. These methods were largely developed for solving nonlinear problems, for example, in solving partial differential equation (PDE) problems, aerospace central problems and orbit transfers [see Canuto et al (1988); Elnagar et al (1995); Erfanian et al (2015); Ross (2001, (2002); Gong et al (2006); Noori Skandari et al (2014); Trefethen (2000); Vlassenbroeck and Van Doreen (1988)]. Among the PS methods, CPS method is more attractive for a number of reasons.…”
Section: Chebyshev Pseudo-spectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modification of the PS methods permits to prove sufficient conditions for feasibility and convergence of the approximate solution. These methods were largely developed for solving nonlinear problems, for example, in solving partial differential equation (PDE) problems, aerospace central problems and orbit transfers [see Canuto et al (1988); Elnagar et al (1995); Erfanian et al (2015); Ross (2001, (2002); Gong et al (2006); Noori Skandari et al (2014); Trefethen (2000); Vlassenbroeck and Van Doreen (1988)]. Among the PS methods, CPS method is more attractive for a number of reasons.…”
Section: Chebyshev Pseudo-spectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors utilized the generalized derivatives of nonsmooth functions in dealing with the solutions of nonsmooth systems (Erfanian et al 2013(Erfanian et al , 2015Noori Skandari et al 2014). Auer et al (2011) combined a generalized derivative with the algorithm of a verified special solver to obtain inclusion of the solutions for nonsmooth systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case M = 0, we have l = 0 and l ′ = 1. Moreover, according to the final time T and terminal point x(T), we must consider one of Equations (10)- (14) and add its discrete form to Equations (26). After solving the obtained algebraic equations, we get the pointwise approximate optimal solutions (18) and continuous approximate optimal solutions (17).…”
Section: Fractional Chebyshev Peudospectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After solving the obtained algebraic equations, we get the pointwise approximate optimal solutions (18) and continuous approximate optimal solutions (17). Notice that, before solving algebraic system (26) ̄1, … ,̄N), we need to calculate the fractional differentiation matrixes D = (D k ) N×(N+1) ,D = (D k ) N×(N+1) and…”
Section: Fractional Chebyshev Peudospectral Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation