Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1090/mcom/3015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of 2D scalar conservation laws in the presence of shocks

Abstract: Abstract. We analyze a model optimal control problem for a 2D scalar conservation law: The so-called inverse design problem, the goal being to identify the initial datum leading to a given final time configuration. The presence of shocks is an impediment for classical methods, based on linearization, to be directly applied. We develop an alternating descent method that exploits the generalized linearization that takes into account both the sensitivity of the shock location and of the smooth components of solut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the present result amounts to characterizing the terminal cost corresponding to given initial cost, see [16,Section 10.3] for further connections to optimal control problems. The present analytic results can also help in numerical investigations such as those in [2,10,26,27]. Sections 2 to 5 collect the analytic results, while all proofs are deferred to sections 6 to 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Here, the present result amounts to characterizing the terminal cost corresponding to given initial cost, see [16,Section 10.3] for further connections to optimal control problems. The present analytic results can also help in numerical investigations such as those in [2,10,26,27]. Sections 2 to 5 collect the analytic results, while all proofs are deferred to sections 6 to 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Theorem 3.1 Let f (y), y(t, ⋅) ∈ C 3 (ℝ) and p(t, ⋅) ∈ C 4 (ℝ) . Then the adjoint WENO3 scheme (20) is adjoint consistent of order three, i.e., r j (t) = O(Δx 3 ) in (24).…”
Section: Discrete Adjoint Wenomethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, taking the adjoint as a decent direction may increase the complexity of the optimization process due to the production of additional discontinuities [5,23,24]. A careful choice of the initial guess u 0 can remedy this serious problem.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of our main motivations applying an optimal control strategy to general conservation laws is the possibility of study numerical inverse problems related to this type of systems. Example of them are the bottom detection in water-waves type system, see [29], or the tracking of initial conditions in the presence of shocks [5,25], to mention but a few.…”
Section: The Optimal Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the present approach works even if the constraint PDE is non-conservative. In the literature, there exist several works dealing with minimization considering hyperbolic conservation laws, see [18,17,5,25,39] to mention but a few. However, to best of our knowledge, the present approach has not been reported previously and this incorporates in a natural way the non-conservative structure of the adjoint model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%