Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2006.1641191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control movement scheme based on manipulability concept for a surgical robotic assistant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two possible solutions: passive or active wrists. Passive wrists consist on a mechanism with no actuated joints [4]- [6]. This feature guarantees that no efforts are applied to the abdominal wall of the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two possible solutions: passive or active wrists. Passive wrists consist on a mechanism with no actuated joints [4]- [6]. This feature guarantees that no efforts are applied to the abdominal wall of the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system Aesop R offers the possibility to save positions of the robotic arm in order to automatically reposition the endoscope, but due to the passive wrist architecture of the robot, the repositionning is not accurate [6]. To address this problem, Munoz et al developed an adaptative motion control scheme to compensate the positionning errors of a passive-wrist camera holder [7]. These limits also led to the development of robotic camera holders more adapted to the surgical environment such as the body-mounted robot LER (see section 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this problem, Munoz et al (2006) developed an adaptive motion control scheme to compensate for the positioning errors of a passive-wrist camera holder. These limits also led to the development of robotic camera holders more adapted to the surgical environment such as the body-mounted Light Endoscopic Robot (LER1 see Section 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability of robot shape modification, as the authors mention, is provided by the robot redundancy. In [68], a control schema of a robotic arm acting as an assistant in RMIS is presented. The trajectory control must avoid singular configurations by means of the computation of dexterity, expressed in terms of manipulability.…”
Section: Dexterity In Control and Trajectory Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%