2012
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-915x2012000100011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control de compactación con penetrómetro ligero en tranques de relaves, considerando su variabilidad material y estructural

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Panda device is a manual, light, dynamic penetrometer with variable energy and a small cone section (2.0 or 4.0 cm2) (Chaigneau, 2001;Villavicencio et al, 2012), which provides the cone resistance qd of the soil as a function of depth, and is capable of performing a large number of tests in situ thanks to its small size and its quick implementation. This device can operate to a depth of 6m and for materials having particles smaller than 50mm.…”
Section: Methodology Estimation Of Relative Density (Dr%) From Dynamimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Panda device is a manual, light, dynamic penetrometer with variable energy and a small cone section (2.0 or 4.0 cm2) (Chaigneau, 2001;Villavicencio et al, 2012), which provides the cone resistance qd of the soil as a function of depth, and is capable of performing a large number of tests in situ thanks to its small size and its quick implementation. This device can operate to a depth of 6m and for materials having particles smaller than 50mm.…”
Section: Methodology Estimation Of Relative Density (Dr%) From Dynamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a robust strategy for managing the potential liquefaction risk, use of a probabilistic approach is an attractive option. However, applying such an approach in practice is limited by the difficulty of obtaining and managing the data (random variables and stochastic fields) to be introduced into the reliability calculations and is conditioned by the relevance of the probability models chosen to represent the variability of sand tailings dam properties (Villavicencio, Breul, Bacconnet, Boissier & Espinace, 2011;Villavicencio, Breul, Espinace & Valenzuela, 2012). In this article, we propose a method to estimate on site the sand tailings relative density (DR%) and its variability, using dynamic penetration tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%