1992
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(92)90501-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control by using automatic combustion with dry scrubber/fabric filtration (DS/FF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCDD/F destruction was also noticed to differ between the different congeners (14), and also shifts in the congeners are possible when flue gases pass by the ESP (15). The combinations of dry scrubber/fabric filter (16), wet scrubber/fabric filter (17,18), or spray absorber/ESP (19) and wet gas scrubbing (20) have also been used successfully to decrease PCDD/F emissions. PCDD/F reduction accompanied with NOx reduction by ammonia injection (21) or ammonia radical injection and by using SCR unit or some other DENOX unit are well-known methods for PCDD/F reduction (22)(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCDD/F destruction was also noticed to differ between the different congeners (14), and also shifts in the congeners are possible when flue gases pass by the ESP (15). The combinations of dry scrubber/fabric filter (16), wet scrubber/fabric filter (17,18), or spray absorber/ESP (19) and wet gas scrubbing (20) have also been used successfully to decrease PCDD/F emissions. PCDD/F reduction accompanied with NOx reduction by ammonia injection (21) or ammonia radical injection and by using SCR unit or some other DENOX unit are well-known methods for PCDD/F reduction (22)(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that while Table 3 presents an estimate of total emissions from municipal waste incinerators as of 1989, measured emissions at modern and welloperated incinerators are lower than this overall average. 17 For example, the baseline emission rate of the mass burn refractory wall incinerators, most of which are about twenty years old, is assumed to be 4000 ng/dscm (dscm = dry standard cubic meter). Because the traveling grate and grate/rotary kiln varieties are typically equipped with electrostatic precipitators operating at 500°F or higher (hot ESP), which has been shown to increase dioxin emissions by roughly 50%, these two varieties were estimated by the EPA to have a dioxin emission factor 50% higher than the baseline emissions of a refractory-wall combustion system.…”
Section: Consumer Waste Incinerationmentioning
confidence: 99%