2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1702(02)00262-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control and eradication of foot-and-mouth disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
254
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
7
254
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Regular vaccination and restriction of animal movement are the major mode of disease control. Stamping out and strict zoo sanitary measures have also been adopted in America [64] and some other countries to eradicate the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular vaccination and restriction of animal movement are the major mode of disease control. Stamping out and strict zoo sanitary measures have also been adopted in America [64] and some other countries to eradicate the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(deer) varies from unapparent or mild in some species to more severe in others [28]. Deer have been infected both naturally and experimentally 2 [14,16,28], and deer-to-deer and deer-to-cattle transmission has been observed [34]. Experimentally infected whitetailed deer exhibited intermediate disease 2 severity compared with susceptible livestock species (i.e., between cattle, sheep, and goats) and approximately 10% of those infected in a 1924 outbreak in California displayed typical signs of FMD infection 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It required two years to eradicate the disease from the local deer population, and more than 22 000 deer were slaughtered 2 [21]. During the 2001 FMD outbreak in the UK, it was feared that a number of the deer species in the country (red, fallow) might become infected and potentially act as a reservoir for the disease [5,34]. A similar concern was also expressed in the Netherlands during the 2001 FMD outbreak [11,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which immunity induced by one virus is effective against another is largely dependent on the antigenic differences between them. Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is an example of an antigenically variable pathogen that infects many species of cloven-hoofed animals, such as cattle, sheep, pigs and goats, and remains a potent threat to agricultural livestock (Sutmoller et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%