1942
DOI: 10.2307/1374993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions to the Natural History of the Bottlenose Dolphin, Tursiops Truncatus (Montague), on the Texas Coast, with Particular Reference to Food Habits

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 169.230.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some learned foraging behaviors appear to be passed from mother to offspring and allow dolphins to specialize on a particular prey item that might otherwise appear to be undesirable. For example, while most fish prey are swallowed whole, dolphins have been known to prey on catfish by severing the head, swallowing just the body, and discarding the noxious barb along with the head (Gunter, 1942;Ronje et al, 2017). In this study we cannot evaluate to what extent such learned behavior might have contributed to dolphin prey choice, but it is conceivable that dolphins from two different populations may have developed different feeding strategies and preferences based on previous experience and group knowledge.…”
Section: Discussion Sighting Differencesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some learned foraging behaviors appear to be passed from mother to offspring and allow dolphins to specialize on a particular prey item that might otherwise appear to be undesirable. For example, while most fish prey are swallowed whole, dolphins have been known to prey on catfish by severing the head, swallowing just the body, and discarding the noxious barb along with the head (Gunter, 1942;Ronje et al, 2017). In this study we cannot evaluate to what extent such learned behavior might have contributed to dolphin prey choice, but it is conceivable that dolphins from two different populations may have developed different feeding strategies and preferences based on previous experience and group knowledge.…”
Section: Discussion Sighting Differencesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The feeding range of T truncatus is extremely wide and its coastal populations tend to specialize in estuary preys. It is usually considered a generalist and opportunist, taking profit of the most abundant preys of the season (GUNTER 1942;ORRIS & PRESCOTT 1961;CALDWELL & CALDWELL 1972;HAMILTON &NISHJMOTO 1977;WELLSetat. 1980;IRVINE et at.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data). Contrary to Gunter's (1942) claim, seasonal density changes have been found, near the mouths of Texas bays (Shane, 1980;Gruber, 1981;Jones, 1988;McHugh, 1989;Fertl, 1994;Weller, 1998), but nothing is yet known about the source of the arriving dolphins or the destination of those departing. Thousands of bottlenose dolphins can be found on the continental shelf, outside the bay systems (Mullin et al, 1990;Scott, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%