1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00645393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions to the kinematics of type I tails of comets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the ion production rate were drastically reduced on a short timescale (less than an hour), the ionosphere of the comet could shrink temporarily and allow the magnetic field lines to slip away. The change of ionization rate in the comet could be strongly influenced by a change in the solar UV radiation or in the density of neutrals out of which the ions are created [Wurm and Mammano, 1972].…”
Section: Ion Production Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the ion production rate were drastically reduced on a short timescale (less than an hour), the ionosphere of the comet could shrink temporarily and allow the magnetic field lines to slip away. The change of ionization rate in the comet could be strongly influenced by a change in the solar UV radiation or in the density of neutrals out of which the ions are created [Wurm and Mammano, 1972].…”
Section: Ion Production Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the cometary tail rays ultimately align close to the antisolar direction, they apparently first appear at large angles with respect to that direction, sometimes in the solar direction, and then fold back toward the antisolar direction. Wurm and Mammano [1972] argue that all the shifts and motions of the rays are not necessarily in response to solar wind flow conditions but are caused by [1981] has suggested that bubbles of continuum radiation escape from the downstream tail in bubbles of solar wind plasma. The solar wind would convect the disconnected fragment in a more-or-less antisunward direction, but motion in the azimuthal direction may be due to pressure gradients transverse to the radial direction.…”
Section: Implications Of Distant Magnetotail Encountersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rays in thLs second part of the ion tail are undisturbed except for a small displacement of some rays near the kink. The angle between these two parts is about 25 0 (Wurm and Mammano, 1972 We are interested in investigating the relation between this kink and solarwind conditions.…”
Section: Comet Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%