Their act of memory is accompanied by an act of translation. They impose on the passage, which they force into their minds, the mark of their personality, they make it their own, they give it their perspective of thinking, they make it the passage of a child. This is a phenomenon one might give the name, comparable to that which occurs in nutrition, of verbal assimilation.The above statement seems unremarkable until one considers its source:Binet and Henri (1894, p. 52). Binet's use of the concept, the nutritional analogy, and even the term assimilation all predated Piaget's by more than three decades. And the example is not an isolated one. Binet's findings on prose memory, eyewitness testimony, group pressure toward conformity, intrinsic motivation, and expertise in chess and mental calculation all long preceded better known recent studies that have rediscovered the same phenomena. As Cairns (1983) commented, "It has taken experimental child psychology 70 years to catch up with some of Binet's insights on cognition and the organization of memory" (p. 47).