2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of the Soleus and Gastrocnemius muscles to the anterior cruciate ligament loading during single-leg landing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
96
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
22
96
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, for both ACL and PCL, several muscles have a significant agonist action. As pointed out by Mokhtarzadeh et al [21], these muscles may be of interest in a rehabilitation program for cruciate ligament injury prevention.…”
Section: Contributions Of Musculo-tendon Forces To Ligament Forcesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, for both ACL and PCL, several muscles have a significant agonist action. As pointed out by Mokhtarzadeh et al [21], these muscles may be of interest in a rehabilitation program for cruciate ligament injury prevention.…”
Section: Contributions Of Musculo-tendon Forces To Ligament Forcesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our results point to a complex organisation with many competing structures. As described in the literature [21,41], the quadriceps acts as antagonist to the ACL and thus helps increase its force (i.e. traction of the ligament) during the stance phase.…”
Section: Contributions Of Musculo-tendon Forces To Ligament Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the open-source musculoskeletal modelling software OpenSim 42 was used in three studies to derive the muscle-tendon forces during landing based on in vivo kinematic, kinetic and EMG data, whereby one study adopted an algorithm based on static optimisation 39 while two studies deployed an advanced algorithm called computed muscle control 11,38 . In comparison to the standardised position of the knee joint and constant pre-tension of muscles (H:Q ratio) for in vitro studies, the reported muscle-tendon forces and knee joint kinematics from in situ computational modelling varied significantly between studies (Tab.…”
Section: @ C I C E D I Z I O N I I N T E R N a Z I O N A L Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IV), with the H:Q ratio prior to impact ranging from 0.33 to 1.33, the initial knee flexion angle from 9° to 34° and the peak VIF from 1.8 to 4.1 times Body Weight (BW). Furthermore, computational simulations were often driven by in vivo data from optical motion capture, ground reaction force measurements and EMG 11,37,39,40 . Here, differences between subjects, testing procedures and data processing likely contributed to the larger range of input parameters compared to cadaveric testing.…”
Section: @ C I C E D I Z I O N I I N T E R N a Z I O N A L Imentioning
confidence: 99%