2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of subtype and spectral frequency analyses to the study of P50 ERP amplitude and suppression in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
93
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
11
93
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, however, are not an isolated instance, as there are other published reports in which no such differences were detected between schizophrenia patients and controls (Andrews et al, 1993;Koyama et al, 1994;Olichney et al, 1997). As with neurophysiological abnormalities in schizophrenia in general (Johannesen et al, 2005), there is considerable overlap in N400 effects between patients with the disorder and healthy individuals (Grillon et al, 1991), and variation in sample characteristics may thus have contributed to these inconsistent results across studies. For example, in our study, patients' average age was older than in any of the studies cited above except that of Olichney et al (1997), which also did not find N400 effect differences between patients and controls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Our results, however, are not an isolated instance, as there are other published reports in which no such differences were detected between schizophrenia patients and controls (Andrews et al, 1993;Koyama et al, 1994;Olichney et al, 1997). As with neurophysiological abnormalities in schizophrenia in general (Johannesen et al, 2005), there is considerable overlap in N400 effects between patients with the disorder and healthy individuals (Grillon et al, 1991), and variation in sample characteristics may thus have contributed to these inconsistent results across studies. For example, in our study, patients' average age was older than in any of the studies cited above except that of Olichney et al (1997), which also did not find N400 effect differences between patients and controls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…This can be compared to a range of about 23-27% for the current study, depending on the modality of stimulation. By contrast, response magnitude within a "low frequency" band (1-20 Hz) has previously been shown to exhibit stronger reductions (∼60%) as ISI decreases (Clementz and Blumenfeld, 2001;Johannesen et al, 2005), consistent with a greater sensitivity to ISI than the gamma band response. Although the low frequency band examined in those studies included beta activity (12-20 Hz), it did not separate this band from lower frequency contributions (<12 Hz).…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies Of Sensory Gatingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…According to the theory discussed here, gamma and beta activity correspond to obligatory stimulus processing and the neural assignment of stimulus-driven salience, respectively. In schizophrenia patients, therefore, demonstration of relatively intact sensory gating in the gamma band, but impaired sensory gating in lower frequency bands (Clementz and Blumenfeld, 2001;Johannesen et al, 2005) suggests that this population might exhibit a deficit in the neural computation of stimulus-driven salience, as opposed to dysfunction in more elementary stimulus processing at the cortical level. However, this hypothesis has not been specifically tested for stimulusevoked oscillations within the restricted latency window typical of the P1 waveform peak.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studies Of Sensory Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 Further supporting this idea, there is a wide range of P50 gating values reported in the literature for both schizophrenia patients and healthy subjects, 29 and many studies failed to find a significantly reduced P50 ratio in schizophrenia patients compared with healthy controls. [30][31][32][33][34][35] Problems with test-retest reliability have been noted frequently, especially with ratio values that introduce a disadvantageous signal-to-noise ratio to both the numerator and the denominator. [36][37][38] Second, the single-subject classification accuracy of the conventional parietal P3 amplitude that is used in a wide range of studies was comparably low although ANOVA revealed a highly reliable significant difference between schizophrenia patients and control subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%