2012
DOI: 10.3103/s0967091212090033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of structural factors to the strength of K65 steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a direction parallel to the pipe axis, the distribution was close to normal with a peak in the region of 5 µm. simultaneously through the specimen, suppressing discontinuous yielding [7]. Aging of sample cut in direction parallel to the rolling axis does not does not influence the stressstrain curve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a direction parallel to the pipe axis, the distribution was close to normal with a peak in the region of 5 µm. simultaneously through the specimen, suppressing discontinuous yielding [7]. Aging of sample cut in direction parallel to the rolling axis does not does not influence the stressstrain curve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fracture toughness is determined by the amount of the work of plastic deformation in the fracture zone, which depends on the type of the microstructure formed during thermomechanical processing of the initial hot-rolled sheet [24][25][26]. Unlike other steels, the pipeline steels have a well-defined ratio of strength, ductility and fracture toughness, which is specified by the thermomechanical processing scheme [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%