2016
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1236255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of Skinner's theory of verbal behaviour to language interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is done by providing exemplars that set the occasion for derived responding to emerge as a functional operant. Advances in verbal behavior approaches have shown that early learning skills can be taught under various sources of stimulus control and in natural environment settings (Johnson, Kohler, & Ross, 2017), but once these pre-requisite learning skills have been established, instructional programming can advance to more advanced, relational targets. PEAK-E begins by testing for the emergence of basic reflexive (e.g., identity matching), symmetrical and transitive responding across sense modalities (e.g., identifying the name of gustatory sensations), complex stimulus class formations (e.g., animal names and habitats), and transfer of function between stimuli (e.g., modification of performance during common games).…”
Section: The Peak Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done by providing exemplars that set the occasion for derived responding to emerge as a functional operant. Advances in verbal behavior approaches have shown that early learning skills can be taught under various sources of stimulus control and in natural environment settings (Johnson, Kohler, & Ross, 2017), but once these pre-requisite learning skills have been established, instructional programming can advance to more advanced, relational targets. PEAK-E begins by testing for the emergence of basic reflexive (e.g., identity matching), symmetrical and transitive responding across sense modalities (e.g., identifying the name of gustatory sensations), complex stimulus class formations (e.g., animal names and habitats), and transfer of function between stimuli (e.g., modification of performance during common games).…”
Section: The Peak Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speed with which multiword requesting emerged—and the lack of multiword requesting when textual prompts were removed in the second baseline—suggests that the textual prompting procedures were in fact responsible for the increase in the children’s use of multiword requesting forms. The successful fading of the textual prompts showed that, by the end of the study, both children were using their newly acquired multiword utterances in a fairly spontaneous manner to accomplish an important communicative function, that is, to gain access to preferred items (Johnson, Kohler, & Ross, 2016). The final level of performance represents an important outcome given that the initiation of spontaneous-functional communication and multiword utterances are often problematic for children with ASD (Chiang & Carter, 2008; Halle, 1987; Koegel & Ashbaugh, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than emphasizing the mechanics of language (e.g., morphology, syntax, semantics), Skinner ( 1957 ) focused on the functions of language (e.g., requesting, labeling, repeating, and responding). As Skinner’s verbal behavior framework directly links the targeted communicative skills with observable context, it has been broadly applied to guide language therapies and research in ASD (Forbes et al, 2020 ; Johnson et al, 2017 ; Sundberg & Michael, 2001 ). It remains unclear, however, whether PRT can be applied to improve the language functions proposed by Skinner ( 1957 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%