Contributions of skin and muscle afferent input to movement sense in the human hand

Abstract

In the stationary hand, static joint-position sense originates from multimodal somatosensory input (e.g., joint, skin, and muscle). In the moving hand, however, it is uncertain how movement sense arises from these different submodalities of proprioceptors. In contrast to static-position sense, movement sense includes multiple parameters such as motion detection, direction, joint angle, and velocity. Because movement sense is both multimodal and multiparametric, it is not known how different movement parameters are represented by different afferent submodalities. In theory, each submodality could redundantly represent all movement parameters, or, alternatively, different afferent submodalities could be tuned to distinctly different movement parameters. The study described in this paper investigated how skin input and muscle input each contributes to movement sense of the hand, in particular, to the movement parameters dynamic position and velocity. Healthy adult subjects were instructed to indicate with the left hand when they sensed the unseen fingers of the right hand being passively flexed at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint through a previously learned target angle. The experimental approach was to suppress input from skin and/or muscle: skin input by anesthetizing the hand, and muscle input by unexpectedly extending the wrist to prevent MCP flexion from stretching the finger extensor muscle. Input from joint afferents was assumed not to play a significant role because the task was carried out with the MCP joints near their neutral positions. We found that, during passive finger movement near the neutral position in healthy adult humans, both skin and muscle receptors contribute to movement sense but qualitatively differently. Whereas skin input contributes to both dynamic position and velocity sense, muscle input may contribute only to velocity sense.

Differences in curvature between constrained and unconstrained goal-directed movements to haptic targets

“…Cutaneous receptors are efficient movement direction and velocity transducers (Gardner and Sklar 1994). For the sense of movement, it is found that both tactile and proprioceptive measures contribute to movement detection (Blanchard et al 2011;Cordo et al 2011). In our study (experiment 1), the thimble reduced the tactile information that was available to the participants.…”

Biases in visuo-haptic matching of curvature

“…As such, it is not possible to claim that the moving finger received information about its movements exclusively through "kinesthesia". Cordo et al [30] have demonstrated the importance of cutaneous-based stimulation (e.g., stretch) to the perception of movement (e.g., position and velocity). Given this information, perhaps the only claim that can be safely made is that the combination of tactile and possibly force [31] information present in the P(T) condition resulted in a cross-modal match that was less accurate than the particular combination of cutaneous and kinesthetic cues in the A(K) condition.…”

Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback

“…Somatosensation is important to normal motor function [21][22][23][24][25]. Study of a single degree of freedom task with able-bodied individuals shows that proprioception is necessary to improve performance even when vision is present and is more important as the task difficulty increases [26].…”