2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of shape and reflectance information to social judgments from faces

Abstract: This paper was accepted for publication in Vision Research. This is a non-final and non-copyedited version of the paper.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, many works have argued (the multiple motive hypothesis ) that the evaluation of facial attractiveness is a complex process, influenced by the prior inference of semantic personality traits (such as dominance, extroversion or trustworthiness) that we consensually attribute to specific shape and luminance patterns in others’ face ( Oh, Dotsch & Todorov, 2019 ; Oh, Grant-Villegas & Todorov, 2020 ; Abir et al, 2017 ; Walker & Vetter, 2016 ; Adolphs et al, 2016 ; Galantucci et al, 2014 ; Little, 2014 ; Todorov & Oosterhof, 2011 ; Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008 ; Edler, 2001 ; Cunningham et al, 1995 ). According to this scenario, facial attractiveness is influenced by the single-subject relative inclination towards some fundamental personality traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, many works have argued (the multiple motive hypothesis ) that the evaluation of facial attractiveness is a complex process, influenced by the prior inference of semantic personality traits (such as dominance, extroversion or trustworthiness) that we consensually attribute to specific shape and luminance patterns in others’ face ( Oh, Dotsch & Todorov, 2019 ; Oh, Grant-Villegas & Todorov, 2020 ; Abir et al, 2017 ; Walker & Vetter, 2016 ; Adolphs et al, 2016 ; Galantucci et al, 2014 ; Little, 2014 ; Todorov & Oosterhof, 2011 ; Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008 ; Edler, 2001 ; Cunningham et al, 1995 ). According to this scenario, facial attractiveness is influenced by the single-subject relative inclination towards some fundamental personality traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this scenario, facial attractiveness is influenced by the single-subject relative inclination towards some fundamental personality traits. In the word of Oh, Dotsch & Todorov (2019) , individuals who highly value a personality trait, such as dominance, are likely to perceive faces that appear to possess the trait as attractive . This implies, in particular, that (A) the single subject preferred faces are expected to be, to some extent, distinguishable if characterised or inferred with sufficient accuracy, and (B) they are expected to reflect meaningful information regarding the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this scenario, facial attractiveness is influenced by the single-subject relative inclination towards some fundamental personality traits. In the word of Oh et al (2019a), individuals who highly value a personality trait, such as dominance, are likely to perceive faces that appear to possess the trait as attractive. This implies, in particular, that (A) the single subject preferred faces are expected to be, to some extent, distinguishable if characterised or inferred with sufficient accuracy, and (B) they are expected to reflect meaningful information regarding the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that facial shape and surface are often operationalized differently in the literature. For example, shape can be defined as second-order spatial relations among facial features in a two-dimensional (Andrews et al, 2016) or three-dimensional space (Jiang et al, 2009; Oh et al, 2019). Also, surface is often referred to as facial color (Russell et al, 2006); reflectance (Russell et al, 2007) or texture (O’Toole et al, 1999), and it typically encompasses information from all such different properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%