2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of phytoplankton and bacteria to the optical backscattering coefficient over the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed uniformity in POC versus b bp slopes could be explained based on Mie theory, namely that planktonic organisms larger than >2 mm have an insignificant effect on bulk b bp [Stramski and Kiefer, 1991]. However, this hypothesis is contradictory to recent in situ and laboratory measurements [Dall'Olmo et al, 2009;Martinez-Vicente et al, 2012;Vaillancourt et al, 2004;Whitmire et al, 2010]. We did observe a significant decrease in the POC versus b bp slope below the pycnocline (Figure 7b).…”
Section: Natural Variability In Poc Versus B Bpcontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed uniformity in POC versus b bp slopes could be explained based on Mie theory, namely that planktonic organisms larger than >2 mm have an insignificant effect on bulk b bp [Stramski and Kiefer, 1991]. However, this hypothesis is contradictory to recent in situ and laboratory measurements [Dall'Olmo et al, 2009;Martinez-Vicente et al, 2012;Vaillancourt et al, 2004;Whitmire et al, 2010]. We did observe a significant decrease in the POC versus b bp slope below the pycnocline (Figure 7b).…”
Section: Natural Variability In Poc Versus B Bpcontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Section 4 reviews NAB08 results in the context of previous findings, and uses the results of this study to infer the potential sources of variability among previously published POC proxies. While changes in plankton are unlikely to be the only cause of the POC optical proxy variability [ Chung et al , 1998; Grob et al , 2007; Martinez‐Vicente et al , 2012; Oubelkheir et al , 2005], we conclude that plankton community composition serves as a diagnostic for the overall particle assemblage accompanying these different plankton communities. In the appendix, we report a small data set for turbidity (broad‐angle sidescattering) and the corresponding POC versus turbidity slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The main reason for this discrepancy rests on the nature of the particles contributing to both Chla and b bp signal. While phytoplankton cells contribute nearly all of the Chla signal (colored dissolved organic matter may also contribute slightly to the Chla signal; Xing et al, ), bacteria, protists, detritus, and mineral material also contribute to the b bp signal (Martinez‐Vicente et al, ; Stramski et al, , ; Stramski & Kiefer, ). Therefore, in the surface layer, an increase in phytoplankton production does not lead to a similar relative increase in the Chla and b bp signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical relationships based on in situ measurements have been proposed between [Chla] and the beam attenuation (scattering plus absorption) coefficient [e.g., Voss, 1992;Loisel and Morel, 1998;Behrenfeld and Boss, 2006], scattering coefficient [e.g., Gordon and Morel, 1983;Loisel and Morel, 1998;Huot et al, 2008], and backscattering coefficient [e.g., Reynolds et al, 2001;Stramska et al, 2006;Huot et al, 2008]. Changes in chlorophyll-specific particulate scattering coefficient, b* p (l) (i.e., particulate scattering coefficient per unit of [Chla]), observed in the field have been related to phytoplankton physiological status [Behrenfeld and Boss, 2003], but the role of cell size in scattering properties of natural phytoplankton communities has been addressed only in few recent studies [Gernez et al, 2011;Brewin et al, 2012;Martinez-Vicente et al, 2012]. The potentially high correlation between scattering and backscattering coefficients may support the use of satellite-derived [Chla] and particulate backscattering for investigation of phytoplankton biomass and physiology [Westberry et al, 2010] as well as size structure [Loisel et al, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%