2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-017-0376-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) to nutrient cycling in an urban river: filtration, recycling, storage, and removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of clearance rates reported central tendencies of 2.3-4.2, 3.6-7.9, 1.1-4.8, and 2.8-6.0 L g −1 h −1 for marine mussels, scallops, cockles, and oysters, respectively (Cranford et al 2011). Zebra mussels in the Laurentian Great Lakes showed clearance rates of 0.5-22.6 L g −1 h −1 ( Johengen et al 2014), and two unionoid species showed rates of 1.8-3.7 L g −1 h −1 in an urban river (Hoellein et al 2017). Clearance rates are scaled from individuals to populations to quantify ecosystem effects.…”
Section: Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A meta-analysis of clearance rates reported central tendencies of 2.3-4.2, 3.6-7.9, 1.1-4.8, and 2.8-6.0 L g −1 h −1 for marine mussels, scallops, cockles, and oysters, respectively (Cranford et al 2011). Zebra mussels in the Laurentian Great Lakes showed clearance rates of 0.5-22.6 L g −1 h −1 ( Johengen et al 2014), and two unionoid species showed rates of 1.8-3.7 L g −1 h −1 in an urban river (Hoellein et al 2017). Clearance rates are scaled from individuals to populations to quantify ecosystem effects.…”
Section: Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, eastern oyster (C. virginica) shell content (by dry weight) is 12.2-12.3% C, 0.2-0.3% N, 0.04-0.1% P (Higgins et al 2011, Newell et al 2005. Shell content for two unionoid species (Lasmigona complanata, Pyganodon grandis) averaged 14.6% C, 1.1% N, and 0.004% P (Hoellein et al 2017). Scaling nutrient content from individuals to populations allows estimate of nutrient removal or sequestration via shell harvest or burial, respectively.…”
Section: Storage In Soft Tissue and Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes promote the retention of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) within freshwater ecosystems and assimilation into food webs, rather than propagation downstream towards marine environments, where they may remain bioavailable and have the potential to contribute to eutrophication (Paerl, ; Vaughn, ). Hoellein, Zarnoch, Bruesewitz, and DeMartini () calculated that the maximum potential quantities of N removed by two unionid mussel species ( Lasmigona complanata (Barnes, 1823) and Pyganodon grandis (Say, 1829), in estimated populations of 610 000 and 170 000 individuals, respectively) in the East Branch DuPage River, North America, was equivalent to a waste water treatment plant costing $266 638 per year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that mussels had the most impact on nitrification genes because their biodeposition products increase porewater NH 3 concentrations (Bril et al., ) and enhanced the flux of NO3 from water to sediment (Hoellein, Zarnoch, Bruesewitz, & DeMartini, ). Other studies have found significantly greater AOB amoA genes corresponding with a higher NH 3 load (Zhang et al., ) and aerophilic conditions (Wang et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%