2019
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution to colonic polyposis of recently proposed predisposing genes and assessment of the prevalence of NTHL1 ‐ and MSH3 ‐associated polyposes

Abstract: Technological advances have allowed the identification of new adenomatous and serrated polyposis genes, and of several candidate genes that require additional supporting evidence of causality. Through an exhaustive literature review and mutational screening of 177 unrelated polyposis patients, we assessed the involvement of MCM9, FOCAD, POLQ, and RNF43 in the predisposition to (nonserrated) colonic polyposis, as well as the prevalence of NTHL1 and MSH3 mutations among genetically unexplained polyposis patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(e) Our analysis was mostly restricted to nonpolyposis CRC, while some genes, such as MCM9 or POLQ , might exert their effect in a polyposis context. This issue has been recently addressed by our group (Terradas et al, 2019). (f) Comparisons between cases and controls were mainly performed on gene basis and not per variant, except for those variants with higher allele frequencies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(e) Our analysis was mostly restricted to nonpolyposis CRC, while some genes, such as MCM9 or POLQ , might exert their effect in a polyposis context. This issue has been recently addressed by our group (Terradas et al, 2019). (f) Comparisons between cases and controls were mainly performed on gene basis and not per variant, except for those variants with higher allele frequencies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Homozygous variants in MCM9 , a DNA helicase involved in HR, DNA replication and MMR, were described in two polyposis-affected siblings [ 57 ]. However, recent case-control data suggests a lack of association of homozygous or heterozygous variants with polyposis or CRC predisposition [ 10 , 58 ]. A frameshift mutation in XRCC4 , a member of the DNA ligase 4 complex involved in the last step of NHEJ, was found in a CRC patient with familial CRC history, which, together with the lack of XRCC4 variant carriers among population controls, led the authors to propose XRCC4 as a candidate gene for CRC predisposition [ 13 ].…”
Section: Candidate Causal Genes For Mismatch Repair Proficient Hermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, prevalence of NTHL1 biallelic carriers among French probands suspected of predisposition to colorectal cancer and polyposis is of 0.2% (8/3936 index cases). As a 1.9% prevalence was estimated among unexplained polyposis patients (5/263 index cases with polyposis), 2 numbers for colorectal cancers and polyposis may not be comparable. Polyposis seems a more specific criterion, but we were unable to define a polyposis series among the 3936 patients with colorectal cancer and/or polyposis patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This syndrome was firstly described in 2015 from whole exome analyses (WES) in a series of polyposis patients without pathogenic variant identified in the APC or MUTYH genes which led to identification of seven homozygous carriers of the NTHL1 c.268C>T p.(Gln90*) (NM_002528.6) truncating variant (rs150766139) 1 . To date, a 1.9% prevalence of NTHL1 pathogenic variants among unexplained polyposis patients has been described (5/263 polyposis families) 2 and only 36 biallelic NTHL1 variant carriers from 23 families have been reported 1‐11 . This syndrome seems to be close to the polyposis predisposition syndrome linked to MUTYH alterations, as it is characterized by colorectal cancers and attenuated adenomatous polyposis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation