1978
DOI: 10.2307/1351529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Receptacles from the Fucoid Ascophyllum nodosum to the Detrital Pool of a North Temperate Estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6, 7) was particularly evident during the precipitous loss of AscophyUwn in September by "storm pruning" (Baardseth 1970), äs well äs its subsequent winter decrease and re-enhanced growth during March to August (except June). The decrease in total biomass in June was probably caused by the dehiscence of fertile receptacles on A. nodosum, äs previous studies have indicated they are lost within a single month and that they account for approximately 50% of the plant's total weight (Josselyn and Mathieson 1978). The dramatic loss of A. nodosum during September of both years was associated with a ' conspicuous increase in the unattached ecad scorpioides in September-November.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…6, 7) was particularly evident during the precipitous loss of AscophyUwn in September by "storm pruning" (Baardseth 1970), äs well äs its subsequent winter decrease and re-enhanced growth during March to August (except June). The decrease in total biomass in June was probably caused by the dehiscence of fertile receptacles on A. nodosum, äs previous studies have indicated they are lost within a single month and that they account for approximately 50% of the plant's total weight (Josselyn and Mathieson 1978). The dramatic loss of A. nodosum during September of both years was associated with a ' conspicuous increase in the unattached ecad scorpioides in September-November.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The increase in the vegetative standing crop with increasing shelter has been noted for Ascaphyllum nadasum (COUSENS 1986). JOSSELYN & MATHIESON (1978) estimated that R.A. of Ascaphyllum is c. 50 % and hence higher than in any population of Fucus vesiculasus so far studied. Fucus spiralis contributed c. 25 % of its biomass to receptacles at peak fertility time and only the Scarlett Point population of Fucus vesiculasus showed higher values than that.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…in the population s a whole changes with time and decreases significantly between September and November (Fig. ca 50% and the contribution by receptacles to the detrital pool is estimated to be 445 g m~2 y" 1 (Josselyn and Mathieson, 1978). This decrease results from changes in the fertility of the population (Table I) which becomes progressively more vegetative due to '" b°th fr°nd αβη5 («cnri«™«t of Sterile In Ascophyüum nodosum the reproductive proportion of the Standing crop is somewhat higher viz.…”
Section: Rmentioning
confidence: 96%