Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background: Obesity rates have significantly increased globally, affecting up to 40% of women of childbearing age in the United States. While prenatal repair of open fetal spina bifida has shown improved outcomes, most fetal surgery centers exclude patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 based on criteria from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial. This exclusion raises concerns about healthcare equity and highlights a significant knowledge gap regarding the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Objective: To review the current state of knowledge regarding open fetal surgery for fetal spina bifida in patients with obesity, focusing on safety, efficacy, and clinical considerations. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed and EMBASE databases, covering articles from the inception of the databases to April 2024. Studies discussing fetal surgery for neural tube defects and documenting BMI measurements and their impact on surgical outcomes, published in peer-reviewed journals, and available in English were included. Quantitative data were extracted into an Excel sheet, and data synthesis was conducted using the R programming language (version 4.3.3). Results: Three retrospective studies examining outcomes of prenatal open spina bifida repair in a total of 43 patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 were identified. These studies did not report significant adverse maternal or fetal outcomes compared to patients with lower BMIs. Our pooled analysis revealed a perinatal mortality rate of 6.1% (95% CI: 1.76–18.92%), with 28.0% (95% CI: 14.0–48.2%) experiencing the premature rupture of membranes and 82.0% (95% CI: 29.2–98.0%) delivering preterm (<37 weeks). Membrane separation was reported in 10.3% of cases (95% CI: 3.3–27.7%), the mean gestational age at birth was 34.3 weeks (95% CI: 32.3–36.3), and the average birth weight was 2651.5 g (95% CI: 2473.7–2829.4). Additionally, 40.1% (95% CI: 23.1–60.0%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Conclusion: While current evidence suggests that fetal spina bifida repair may be feasible in patients with obesity, significant limitations in the existing body of research were identified. These include small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. There is an urgent need for large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies to definitively establish the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Such research is crucial for developing evidence-based guidelines, improving clinical outcomes, and addressing healthcare disparities in this growing patient population with obesity.
Background: Obesity rates have significantly increased globally, affecting up to 40% of women of childbearing age in the United States. While prenatal repair of open fetal spina bifida has shown improved outcomes, most fetal surgery centers exclude patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 based on criteria from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial. This exclusion raises concerns about healthcare equity and highlights a significant knowledge gap regarding the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Objective: To review the current state of knowledge regarding open fetal surgery for fetal spina bifida in patients with obesity, focusing on safety, efficacy, and clinical considerations. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed and EMBASE databases, covering articles from the inception of the databases to April 2024. Studies discussing fetal surgery for neural tube defects and documenting BMI measurements and their impact on surgical outcomes, published in peer-reviewed journals, and available in English were included. Quantitative data were extracted into an Excel sheet, and data synthesis was conducted using the R programming language (version 4.3.3). Results: Three retrospective studies examining outcomes of prenatal open spina bifida repair in a total of 43 patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 were identified. These studies did not report significant adverse maternal or fetal outcomes compared to patients with lower BMIs. Our pooled analysis revealed a perinatal mortality rate of 6.1% (95% CI: 1.76–18.92%), with 28.0% (95% CI: 14.0–48.2%) experiencing the premature rupture of membranes and 82.0% (95% CI: 29.2–98.0%) delivering preterm (<37 weeks). Membrane separation was reported in 10.3% of cases (95% CI: 3.3–27.7%), the mean gestational age at birth was 34.3 weeks (95% CI: 32.3–36.3), and the average birth weight was 2651.5 g (95% CI: 2473.7–2829.4). Additionally, 40.1% (95% CI: 23.1–60.0%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Conclusion: While current evidence suggests that fetal spina bifida repair may be feasible in patients with obesity, significant limitations in the existing body of research were identified. These include small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. There is an urgent need for large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies to definitively establish the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Such research is crucial for developing evidence-based guidelines, improving clinical outcomes, and addressing healthcare disparities in this growing patient population with obesity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.