“…Subchondral BMLs represent regions of subchondral bone characterized as displaying increased bone turnover, and expression of factors, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, that can increase nerve sensitization [ 5 ]. We previously showed that nerve growth factor expression within osteochondral channels, and subchondral osteoclast density, each is associated with knee OA pain [ 12 ], and calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive sensory nerves within osteochondral channels are associated with pain in human and rat knee OA [ 15 ]. Activation of sensory nerves in subchondral bone might contribute to weight-bearing pain in knee OA.…”
Background
Subchondral bone marrow lesions (BMLs) detected on MRI in knee osteoarthritis (OA) are associated with knee pain. The prevalence and progression of subchondral BMLs are increased by mechanical knee load. However, associations of subchondral BML location with weight-bearing knee pain are currently unknown. In this study, we aim to demonstrate associations of subchondral BML location and size with weight-bearing knee pain in knee OA.
Methods
We analyzed 1412 and 582 varus knees from cross-sectional and longitudinal Osteoarthritis Initiative datasets, respectively. BML scores were semi-quantitatively analyzed with the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score for 4 subchondral regions (median and lateral femorotibial, medial and lateral patellofemoral) and subspinous region. Weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing pain scores were derived from WOMAC pain items. Correlation and negative binomial regression models were used for analysis of associations between the BML scores and pain at baseline and changes in the BML scores and changes in pain after 24-month follow-up.
Results
Greater BML scores at medial femorotibial and lateral patellofemoral compartments were associated with greater weight-bearing pain scores, and statistical significance was retained after adjusting for BML scores at the other 4 joint compartments and other OA features, as well as for non-weight-bearing pain, age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) (medial femorotibial; B = 0.08, p = 0.02. patellofemoral; B = 0.13, p = 0.01). Subanalysis revealed that greater medial femorotibial BML scores were associated with greater pain on walking and standing (B = 0.11, p = 0.01, and B = 0.10, p = 0.04, respectively). Lateral patellofemoral BML scores were associated with pain on climbing, respectively (B = 0.14, p = 0.02). Increases or decreases over 24 months in BML score in the medial femorotibial compartment were significantly associated with increases or decreases in weight-bearing pain severity after adjusting for non-weight-bearing pain, age, sex, baseline weight-bearing pain, BMI, and BML at the other 4 joint compartments (B = 0.10, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Subchondral BML size at the medial femorotibial joint compartment was specifically associated with the severity and the change in weight-bearing pain, independent of non-weight-bearing pain, in knee OA. Specific associations of weight-bearing pain with subchondral BMLs in weight-bearing compartments of the knee indicate that BMLs in subchondral bone contribute to biomechanically induced OA pain.
“…Subchondral BMLs represent regions of subchondral bone characterized as displaying increased bone turnover, and expression of factors, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, that can increase nerve sensitization [ 5 ]. We previously showed that nerve growth factor expression within osteochondral channels, and subchondral osteoclast density, each is associated with knee OA pain [ 12 ], and calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive sensory nerves within osteochondral channels are associated with pain in human and rat knee OA [ 15 ]. Activation of sensory nerves in subchondral bone might contribute to weight-bearing pain in knee OA.…”
Background
Subchondral bone marrow lesions (BMLs) detected on MRI in knee osteoarthritis (OA) are associated with knee pain. The prevalence and progression of subchondral BMLs are increased by mechanical knee load. However, associations of subchondral BML location with weight-bearing knee pain are currently unknown. In this study, we aim to demonstrate associations of subchondral BML location and size with weight-bearing knee pain in knee OA.
Methods
We analyzed 1412 and 582 varus knees from cross-sectional and longitudinal Osteoarthritis Initiative datasets, respectively. BML scores were semi-quantitatively analyzed with the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score for 4 subchondral regions (median and lateral femorotibial, medial and lateral patellofemoral) and subspinous region. Weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing pain scores were derived from WOMAC pain items. Correlation and negative binomial regression models were used for analysis of associations between the BML scores and pain at baseline and changes in the BML scores and changes in pain after 24-month follow-up.
Results
Greater BML scores at medial femorotibial and lateral patellofemoral compartments were associated with greater weight-bearing pain scores, and statistical significance was retained after adjusting for BML scores at the other 4 joint compartments and other OA features, as well as for non-weight-bearing pain, age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) (medial femorotibial; B = 0.08, p = 0.02. patellofemoral; B = 0.13, p = 0.01). Subanalysis revealed that greater medial femorotibial BML scores were associated with greater pain on walking and standing (B = 0.11, p = 0.01, and B = 0.10, p = 0.04, respectively). Lateral patellofemoral BML scores were associated with pain on climbing, respectively (B = 0.14, p = 0.02). Increases or decreases over 24 months in BML score in the medial femorotibial compartment were significantly associated with increases or decreases in weight-bearing pain severity after adjusting for non-weight-bearing pain, age, sex, baseline weight-bearing pain, BMI, and BML at the other 4 joint compartments (B = 0.10, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Subchondral BML size at the medial femorotibial joint compartment was specifically associated with the severity and the change in weight-bearing pain, independent of non-weight-bearing pain, in knee OA. Specific associations of weight-bearing pain with subchondral BMLs in weight-bearing compartments of the knee indicate that BMLs in subchondral bone contribute to biomechanically induced OA pain.
“… 113 Calcitonin gene-related peptide-immunopositive (CGRP-IP) sensory nerve innervation has been shown to be significantly associated with OA pain manifestation, with the percentage of subchondral bone plate cavities containing CGRP-IP sensory nerves being obviously higher in the human symptomatic OA group than in the asymptomatic group. 114 …”
Section: Subchondral Bone Microenvironment In Oamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than cartilage, the abovementioned CGRP-IP nerve fibers in the osteochondral plate channels have been found to be more critical to OA pain in both humans and rats. 114 Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of OA pain.…”
Section: Subchondral Bone Microenvironment and Oa Painmentioning
Osteoarthritis comprises several joint disorders characterized by articular cartilage degeneration and persistent pain, causing disability and economic burden. The incidence of osteoarthritis is rapidly increasing worldwide due to aging and obesity trends. Basic and clinical research on osteoarthritis has been carried out for decades, but many questions remain unanswered. The exact role of subchondral bone during the initiation and progression osteoarthritis remains unclear. Accumulating evidence shows that subchondral bone lesions, including bone marrow edema and angiogenesis, develop earlier than cartilage degeneration. Clinical interventions targeting subchondral bone have shown therapeutic potential, while others targeting cartilage have yielded disappointing results. Abnormal subchondral bone remodeling, angiogenesis and sensory nerve innervation contribute directly or indirectly to cartilage destruction and pain. This review is about bone-cartilage crosstalk, the subchondral microenvironment and the critical role of both in osteoarthritis progression. It also provides an update on the pathogenesis of and interventions for osteoarthritis and future research targeting subchondral bone.
“…In general, systemic injection necessitates a 10 mg/kg dose, corresponding to 5 mg/injection [ 22 , 23 ]. Aso et al found that the inhibition of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TrkA), a high-affinity receptor of the NGF, reduced pain in meniscal transection-operated rats after oral treatment with 30 mg/kg twice daily [ 24 ]. Additionally, systemic administration of the NGF antibody in rat models increased limbs edema [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Systemic injection of a nerve growth factor (NGF) antibody has been proven to have a significant relevance in relieving osteoarthritis (OA) pain, while its adverse effects remain a safety concern for patients. A local low-dose injection is thought to minimize adverse effects. In this study, OA was induced in an 8-week-old male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat joint by monoiodoacetate (MIA) injection for 2 weeks, and the effect of weekly injections of low-dose (1, 10, and 100 µg) NGF antibody or saline (control) was evaluated. Behavioral tests were performed, and at the end of week 6, all rats were sacrificed and their knee joints were collected for macroscopic and histological evaluations. Results showed that 100 µg NGF antibody injection relieved pain in OA rats, as evidenced from improved weight-bearing performance but not allodynia. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in macroscopic and histological scores between rats from different groups, demonstrating that intra-articular treatment does not worsen OA progression. These results suggest that local administration yielded a low effective NGF antibody dose that may serve as an alternative approach to systemic injection for the treatment of patients with OA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
