2014
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of light-absorbing impurities in snow to Greenland’s darkening since 2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
219
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
219
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive trends over seasonally snow-covered areas are most likely due to a decrease in snow coverage (e.g., Qu and Hall, 2007;Vaughan et al, 2013), and the trend in LCrRE that we find over northern Asia is consistent with studies showing recent declines in snow cover over this region (e.g., Dery and Brown, 2007;Brown and Robinson, 2011;Derksen et al, 2014). Possible reasons for the positive trends seen over Greenland include (1) increased snow metamorphism and black carbon deposition (e.g., Box et al, 2012;Keegan et al, 2014); (2) transport and deposition of dust and other light-absorbing impurities over the ice sheets due to increased dust source areas associated with increased snowfree area (Dumont et al, 2014); (3) higher melt extent across the Greenland ice sheet expose more fresh water at the surface (Tedesco et al, 2014); and (4) MODIS sensor degradation on the Terra satellite during recent years (Sun et al, 2014;Lyapustin et al, 2014), which would indicate a spurious decline in albedo. We also observe slightly negative LCrRE trends over Antarctica, which may be due to increases in snowfall that have decreased the duration that surface snow has to "age", thereby increasing surface albedo (Picard et al, 2012).…”
Section: Interannual Trendssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Positive trends over seasonally snow-covered areas are most likely due to a decrease in snow coverage (e.g., Qu and Hall, 2007;Vaughan et al, 2013), and the trend in LCrRE that we find over northern Asia is consistent with studies showing recent declines in snow cover over this region (e.g., Dery and Brown, 2007;Brown and Robinson, 2011;Derksen et al, 2014). Possible reasons for the positive trends seen over Greenland include (1) increased snow metamorphism and black carbon deposition (e.g., Box et al, 2012;Keegan et al, 2014); (2) transport and deposition of dust and other light-absorbing impurities over the ice sheets due to increased dust source areas associated with increased snowfree area (Dumont et al, 2014); (3) higher melt extent across the Greenland ice sheet expose more fresh water at the surface (Tedesco et al, 2014); and (4) MODIS sensor degradation on the Terra satellite during recent years (Sun et al, 2014;Lyapustin et al, 2014), which would indicate a spurious decline in albedo. We also observe slightly negative LCrRE trends over Antarctica, which may be due to increases in snowfall that have decreased the duration that surface snow has to "age", thereby increasing surface albedo (Picard et al, 2012).…”
Section: Interannual Trendssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A potential climate impact of BC emissions is related to the deposition of BC on snow and ice which substantially reduces the surface albedo (e.g., Dumont et al, 2014). In this context, the question arises how strongly deposition rates in the Arctic and Antarctic depend on emission heights.…”
Section: Total Deposition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study (Dumont et al, 2014) concluded that dust deposition has been increasing over much of the GrIS and that this is driving lowered albedo across the ice sheet. That conclusion was based on trends of an "impurity index", which is the ratio of the logarithm of albedo in the 545-565 nm MODIS band (where LAI affect albedo) to the logarithm of albedo in the 841-876 nm band (where they do not).…”
Section: Trends In Aod Over Greenlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Dumont et al (2014) study, this correction was made using simulations of atmospheric aerosols by the Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC) model. Their resulting impurity index shows positive trends, and these are attributed in part (up to 30 %) to increases in atmospheric aerosol not accounted for by the model, and the remainder to increases in snow LAI.…”
Section: Trends In Aod Over Greenlandmentioning
confidence: 99%