1970
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/3/6/019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Fe2+, Mn3+and Fe3+ions to the magnetic anisotropy of MgxMn0.6Fe2.4-xO4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present model provides another probable mechanism which is favourable for the explanation of the low-temperature behaviour of these iron-rich ferrites. I n Mg,Mn0.6Fe2.4-,0~ system, as mentioned already, Gerber and Elbinger found the positive anisotropy constant for Fez+ ions over the whole temperature range of measurement, monotonically decreasing with increasing temperature [6]. The temperature dependence may be interpreted by taking a large value for E, as seen by the curve for E = 500 cm-l in Fig.…”
Section: Y3 + Y4supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present model provides another probable mechanism which is favourable for the explanation of the low-temperature behaviour of these iron-rich ferrites. I n Mg,Mn0.6Fe2.4-,0~ system, as mentioned already, Gerber and Elbinger found the positive anisotropy constant for Fez+ ions over the whole temperature range of measurement, monotonically decreasing with increasing temperature [6]. The temperature dependence may be interpreted by taking a large value for E, as seen by the curve for E = 500 cm-l in Fig.…”
Section: Y3 + Y4supporting
confidence: 67%
“…f --f l), equation (7) reduces t o the formula that has been derived by neglecting the effect of electron migration between Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions [6]. I n the case of E = 0, on the other hand, it is obvious that ( 5 ) coincides with (4).…”
Section: Y3 + Y4mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the calculation of K 1 of present ferrites, c was taken as À 3/4 since K 1 for Mg-Mn ferrite is known to be negative [42,43]. It is seen from Fig.…”
Section: Initial Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of the exchange field corresponding to g 0 B H ex ϭ100 meV would explain the experimental value of K 1 ϭ2.7ϫ10 Ϫ5 eV. 42 The calculations have been performed using a spin-orbit parameter 3d that is 80 % of the spin-orbit parameter that was obtained for the free ion. 20 Without this reduction of the spin-orbit parameter it is not possible to explain the experimental value of K 1 , since it would require unrealistically high exchange fields ͑see Fig.…”
Section: Results For Specific Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%