2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of ESR/U-series dating to the chronology of late Middle Palaeolithic sites in the middle Rhône valley, southeastern France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
29
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several numerical dating methods, such as thermoluminescence (TL, Huxtable and Aitken, 1991), uncalibrated radiocarbon ( 14 C, Bastin & Gewelt, 1986) and Uranium-series (U-series) in caves and river terrace calcrete were also used (Ambert & Ambert, 1995). Advances in numerical dating methods during the last two decades have allowed more robust chronologies to be developed (Couchoud, 2008;Richard et al, 2015;Rixhon et al, 2016). Calibrated radiocarbon ages (cal 14 C), optically stimulated luminescence (OSL, e. g. Vernet et al, 2008), and electron spin resonance (ESR, e. g. Moreno et al, 2012) techniques have become more widely applied.…”
Section: Dating Methods In Karstic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several numerical dating methods, such as thermoluminescence (TL, Huxtable and Aitken, 1991), uncalibrated radiocarbon ( 14 C, Bastin & Gewelt, 1986) and Uranium-series (U-series) in caves and river terrace calcrete were also used (Ambert & Ambert, 1995). Advances in numerical dating methods during the last two decades have allowed more robust chronologies to be developed (Couchoud, 2008;Richard et al, 2015;Rixhon et al, 2016). Calibrated radiocarbon ages (cal 14 C), optically stimulated luminescence (OSL, e. g. Vernet et al, 2008), and electron spin resonance (ESR, e. g. Moreno et al, 2012) techniques have become more widely applied.…”
Section: Dating Methods In Karstic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unit 5 is dated to the end of the MIS 5/beginning of MIS 4 at 90 thousand years (ka). Level 4.1 is dated to between 40 ± 3 ka and 46 ± 3 ka (MIS 3), while samples from Level 4.2 provided ages ranging from 41 ± 2 ka, 46 ± 5 ka to 52 ± 2 ka (MIS 3) 10 . The cordage remains are from Level 4.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site was studied from a multidisciplinary point of view for over ten years (Daujeard et al, 2019;Hardy et al, 2020Hardy et al, , 2013Moncel et al, 2014Moncel et al, , 2010Puaud et al, 2015;Richard et al, 2015;Vettese et al, 2017). In this paper, we present the zooarchaeological analysis of the faunal assemblage from level 5 of Abri du Maras, recovered during fieldwork carried out from 2006-2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%