2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of Donors After Cardiac Death to the Deceased Donor Pool: 2002 to 2009 University of Liege Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, European centers consistently report higher rates of DCDD utilization of up to 30-70% of all deceased donors, including some uncontrolled (Maastricht type 2) donors [3 ,4 , [5][6][7]. Ledinh et al [8 ] report the recent development of a DCDD program in Belgium over 8 years. The number of DCDD grafts increased from 3.7% of all liver and kidney grafts in 2002 to 34% in 2009 with nearly a quarter of all kidney transplants from donors after circulatory determination of death [8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, European centers consistently report higher rates of DCDD utilization of up to 30-70% of all deceased donors, including some uncontrolled (Maastricht type 2) donors [3 ,4 , [5][6][7]. Ledinh et al [8 ] report the recent development of a DCDD program in Belgium over 8 years. The number of DCDD grafts increased from 3.7% of all liver and kidney grafts in 2002 to 34% in 2009 with nearly a quarter of all kidney transplants from donors after circulatory determination of death [8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its implementation four and a half years ago, DCD has accounted for 10.9% of deceased donor activity in Ontario, Canada [18] . The majority of DCD kidneys are from controlled donors meaning that the number of organs can be further increased by utilising uncontrolled donors [3,4,12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] although the associated workload is considerably more and the yield rate poorer. Reports from some centres show that DCD from deaths outside the hospital may be a good source of donor kidneys and may provide a way to successfully increase the donor pool for organ transplantation [31] .…”
Section: Spread Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koffman [72] showed that DCD consistently increased the number of available kidneys without any effect on DBD donations. Ledinh et al [26] evaluated the organ procurement and transplantation activity from DCD in their unit (Belgium) over an 8-year period to determine its effect on transplantation programs, or DBD activity. They concluded that the establishment of a DCD program enlarged the donor pool and did not compromise the development of DBD program.…”
Section: Series Type Number Patient Survival (%) Graft Survival (%) Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, the study demonstrated that 1 year kidney graft survival was 12% higher in recipient of a machine perfused graft which presented a PO delayed graft function (DGF) compared to recipients of a cold storage preserved graft. 27 . That study helped the Belgian Centers to implement the use of DCD without jeopardizing the DBD procurement rate (Fig.…”
Section: As In Hbd Procedures the Diagnosis Of Death In A Nhbd Has Tmentioning
confidence: 99%