2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of DEAF1 Structural Domains to the Interaction with the Breast Cancer Oncogene LMO4

Abstract: The proteins LMO4 and DEAF1 contribute to the proliferation of mammary epithelial cells. During breast cancer LMO4 is upregulated, affecting its interaction with other protein partners. This may set cells on a path to tumour formation. LMO4 and DEAF1 interact, but it is unknown how they cooperate to regulate cell proliferation. In this study, we identify a specific LMO4-binding domain in DEAF1. This domain contains an unstructured region that directly contacts LMO4, and a coiled coil that contains the DEAF1 nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously defined the LMO4-interaction domain in DEAF1 as DEAF1 404–438 [52] , which is predicted to be unstructured in the context of the full-length protein [52] , [53] by sequence analysis programs that predict order/disorder, PONDR [61] and IUPred [62] , and lacks substantial levels of secondary structure by JPred3 (which predicts secondary structure based on sequence) [63] . To identify residues of DEAF1 that are important for binding LMO4, sequential sets of three residues in DEAF1 404–438 were mutated to alanine (or glycine if the original residue was alanine) and screened for an interaction with LMO4 by yeast two-hybrid analysis ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We previously defined the LMO4-interaction domain in DEAF1 as DEAF1 404–438 [52] , which is predicted to be unstructured in the context of the full-length protein [52] , [53] by sequence analysis programs that predict order/disorder, PONDR [61] and IUPred [62] , and lacks substantial levels of secondary structure by JPred3 (which predicts secondary structure based on sequence) [63] . To identify residues of DEAF1 that are important for binding LMO4, sequential sets of three residues in DEAF1 404–438 were mutated to alanine (or glycine if the original residue was alanine) and screened for an interaction with LMO4 by yeast two-hybrid analysis ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vectors containing inserts encoding surface mutants of LMO4 [19] were sub-cloned into pGAD10. DEAF1 mutants were generated using overlap extension PCR on the background template DEAF1 404–438_457–479 [52] . L4-DEAF1 (DEAF1 404–438 containing a T435D mutation and a polyproline C-terminal tail) was cloned into the plasmid pRSET-A.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, LMO4 interacts with amino acid residues 404–479 of DEAF1, which includes the NES. The interaction of DEAF1 with LMO4 was found to stimulate the nuclear accumulation of DEAF1 in overexpression studies, presumably because the NES was masked (38). In contrast to LMO4, we were unable to detect an interaction between Pellino1 and amino acid residues 404–479 of DEAF1 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tethered complexes are not amenable to standard quantitative binding studies. Yeast‐two hybrid (Y2 H) assays suggest that the interactions of LMO4 with CtIP and Deaf1 are significantly weaker than with LDB1 ,. Homologous competition ELISA experiments using complexes in which the tether has been cut by a protease yielded estimates of LDB1 LID :LMO2/4 LIM1+2 affinity ( K d =20 and 10 n m respectively), but are not suited to weaker interactions due to multiple washing steps.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%