Contribution of Connectivity Assessments to Green Infrastructure (GI)

Abstract

A major goal of green infrastructure (GI) is to provide functional networks of habitats and ecosystems to maintain biodiversity long-term, while at the same time optimizing landscape and ecosystem functions and services to meet human needs. Traditionally, connectivity studies are informed by movement ecology with species-specific attributes of the type and timing of movement (e.g., dispersal, foraging, mating) and movement distances, while spatial environmental data help delineate movement pathways across landscapes. To date, a range of methods and approaches are available that (a) are relevant across any organism and movement type independent of time and space scales, (b) are ready-to-use as standalone freeware or custom GIS implementation, and (c) produce appealing visual outputs that facilitate communication with land managers. However, to enhance the robustness of connectivity assessments and ensure that current trends in connectivity modeling contribute to GI with their full potential, common denominators on which to ground planning and design strategies are required. Likewise, comparable, repeatable connectivity assessments will be needed to put results of these scientific tools into practice for multi-functional GI plans and implementation. In this paper, we discuss use and limitations of state-of-the-art connectivity methods in contributing to GI implementation.

Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review

“…Even though these principles call for spatial integration of environmental, social, economic, cultural, and aesthetic functions, some concerns and criticisms have been expressed in recent years about their applicability [127]. In reality, there has been an increase of studies that focus on understanding how such theorical concepts can definitely be implemented and evaluated [81,86,106,111,125], and this research clearly has shown that. The number of studies regarding ecosystem services in spatial planning and biodiversity enhancement in urban areas have been increasing and attempts to materialize these principles have been equally studied.…”

The Network of Green Infrastructure Based on Ecosystem Services Supply in Central Europe

“…Ecological corridors in the GI network generally avoid cities because the supply of regulating and maintenance ES there is rather small compared to their surroundings; however, spatial resolution of the analysis is too coarse to depict linear barriers that significantly impede species movement. We are aware that the method proposed here can improve the structural connectivity of N2k sites, but the functionality of the network would have to be validated [89]. At a national level, de la Fuente et al [50] verified resistance surface with landscape genetic data.…”

Many-Objective Optimization of Sustainable Drainage Systems in Urban Areas with Different Surface Slopes

“…Rain barrels and cisterns are useful to temporarily detain runoff and limit its flow into gutters to reduce pressure imposed on the drainage system. Furthermore, green roofs can slow down, absorb, retain runoff, reduce the energy use of buildings, increase the life of roofing systems, and regulate building temperature (Bolliger and Silbernagel 2020). Given their different properties and performance in terms of decreasing flood volume and stormwater pollution, cost-effective combination and spatial distribution of these assets are desirable.…”